Sequoia ForestKeeper vs. U.S. Forest Service, et al.

Filing 98

STIPULATION and ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION REGARDING FEES signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on April 12, 2011. (Lira, I)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 . LONG (SB# 244147) NATHAN T. MOORE (SB# 268391) PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 55 Second Street Twenty-Fourth Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-3441 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 5 6 7 RENÉ VOSS (SB# 255758) 15 Alderney Road San Anselmo, CA 94960-1601 Telephone: (415) 446-9027 Facsimile: (267) 316-3414 8 9 10 11 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff SEQUOIA FORESTKEEPER BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney J. EARLENE GORDON Assistant United States Attorneys 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2991 Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 14 15 Attorneys for the Federal Defendants 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 FRESNO DIVISION 19 20 21 SEQUOIA FORESTKEEPER, a non-profit organization, Plaintiff, 22 23 24 25 26 27 CASE NO. 1:09-CV-00392-LJO-JLT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION REGARDING FEES vs. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, TOM TIDWELL, in his official capacity as Chief of the United States Forest Service, and TINA TERRELL, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor for Sequoia National Forest, Judge: Honorable Lawrence J. O’Neill Complaint Filed: March 2, 2009 Defendants. 28 Case No. C 09-00392 LJO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION REGARDING FEES 1 WHEREAS the Court entered an amended judgment on March 16, 2011; 2 WHEREAS any application for attorneys’ fees pursuant to Local Rule 293(a) 3 would otherwise be due not later than twenty-eight (28) days after entry of final judgment; 4 WHEREAS any motion pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 5 U.S.C. § 2412, is due “within 30 days of final judgment in the action,” and defines “final 6 judgment” as “a judgment that is final and not appealable,” 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(G); 7 8 WHEREAS the judgment in this case becomes unappealable 60 days from the time of its entry; 9 WHEREAS Plaintiff Sequoia ForestKeeper and the Federal Defendants have not 10 yet had an opportunity to meet and confer with respect to this Court’s order and amended 11 judgment or with respect to attorneys’ fees and expenses relating to the litigation; 12 13 WHEREAS Federal Defendants have not yet determined whether they will appeal the final judgment in this case; 14 15 WHEREAS Plaintiff seeks to clarify the timing for filing an EAJA motion for fees and expenses pursuant to Local Rule 293(a); 16 WHEREAS Plaintiff and the Federal Defendants agree to extend the deadline for 17 an application for attorneys’ fees under the Local Rule to coincide with the deadline under the 18 EAJA; 19 NOW THEREFORE the parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby 20 stipulate and agree that the deadline for Plaintiff to file a motion for attorneys’ fees and expenses 21 under Local Rule 293(a) is hereby extended to be the same as the deadline for filing an 22 application for fees under EAJA. By entering into this stipulation, Federal Defendants do not 23 waive any defenses as to whether Plaintiff is entitled to fees or costs. 24 DATED: April 12, 2011 25 PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP By: /s/ Eric A. Long ERIC A. LONG 26 Attorneys for Plaintiff SEQUOIA FORESTKEEPER 27 28 -1Case No. C 09-00392 LJO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION REGARDING FEES 1 DATED: April 12, 2011 2 By: 3 4 /s/ J. Earlene Gordon (as authorized on 4/12/11) J. EARLENE GORDON Attorneys for the Federal Defendants 5 6 7 ORDER The Court has considered the above Stipulation, and good cause appearing 8 therefore, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: the deadline for Plaintiff to file a motion for 9 attorneys’ fees and expenses under Local Rule 293(a) is hereby extended to be the same as the 10 deadline for filing an application for fees under EAJA. Plaintiff shall file any application or 11 motion for attorneys’ fees no later than no later than thirty days after this Court’s amended 12 judgment becomes non-appealable. 13 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 Dated: April 12, 2011____ _/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill___ Lawrence J. O’Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 LEGAL_US_W # 67665425.1 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2Case No. C 09-00392 LJO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION REGARDING FEES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?