Sequoia ForestKeeper vs. U.S. Forest Service, et al.
Filing
98
STIPULATION and ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION REGARDING FEES signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on April 12, 2011. (Lira, I)
1
2
3
4
. LONG (SB# 244147)
NATHAN T. MOORE (SB# 268391)
PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP
55 Second Street
Twenty-Fourth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-3441
Telephone: (415) 856-7000
Facsimile: (415) 856-7100
5
6
7
RENÉ VOSS (SB# 255758)
15 Alderney Road
San Anselmo, CA 94960-1601
Telephone: (415) 446-9027
Facsimile: (267) 316-3414
8
9
10
11
12
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SEQUOIA FORESTKEEPER
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
J. EARLENE GORDON
Assistant United States Attorneys
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2991
Facsimile: (916) 554-2900
14
15
Attorneys for the Federal Defendants
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
FRESNO DIVISION
19
20
21
SEQUOIA FORESTKEEPER, a non-profit
organization,
Plaintiff,
22
23
24
25
26
27
CASE NO. 1:09-CV-00392-LJO-JLT
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE
MOTION REGARDING FEES
vs.
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE,
TOM TIDWELL, in his official capacity as
Chief of the United States Forest Service, and
TINA TERRELL, in her official capacity as
Forest Supervisor for Sequoia National Forest,
Judge:
Honorable Lawrence J. O’Neill
Complaint Filed: March 2, 2009
Defendants.
28
Case No. C 09-00392 LJO
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION
REGARDING FEES
1
WHEREAS the Court entered an amended judgment on March 16, 2011;
2
WHEREAS any application for attorneys’ fees pursuant to Local Rule 293(a)
3
would otherwise be due not later than twenty-eight (28) days after entry of final judgment;
4
WHEREAS any motion pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28
5
U.S.C. § 2412, is due “within 30 days of final judgment in the action,” and defines “final
6
judgment” as “a judgment that is final and not appealable,” 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(G);
7
8
WHEREAS the judgment in this case becomes unappealable 60 days from the
time of its entry;
9
WHEREAS Plaintiff Sequoia ForestKeeper and the Federal Defendants have not
10
yet had an opportunity to meet and confer with respect to this Court’s order and amended
11
judgment or with respect to attorneys’ fees and expenses relating to the litigation;
12
13
WHEREAS Federal Defendants have not yet determined whether they will appeal
the final judgment in this case;
14
15
WHEREAS Plaintiff seeks to clarify the timing for filing an EAJA motion for fees
and expenses pursuant to Local Rule 293(a);
16
WHEREAS Plaintiff and the Federal Defendants agree to extend the deadline for
17
an application for attorneys’ fees under the Local Rule to coincide with the deadline under the
18
EAJA;
19
NOW THEREFORE the parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby
20
stipulate and agree that the deadline for Plaintiff to file a motion for attorneys’ fees and expenses
21
under Local Rule 293(a) is hereby extended to be the same as the deadline for filing an
22
application for fees under EAJA. By entering into this stipulation, Federal Defendants do not
23
waive any defenses as to whether Plaintiff is entitled to fees or costs.
24
DATED: April 12, 2011
25
PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP
By:
/s/ Eric A. Long
ERIC A. LONG
26
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SEQUOIA FORESTKEEPER
27
28
-1Case No. C 09-00392 LJO
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION
REGARDING FEES
1
DATED: April 12, 2011
2
By:
3
4
/s/ J. Earlene Gordon (as authorized on 4/12/11)
J. EARLENE GORDON
Attorneys for the Federal Defendants
5
6
7
ORDER
The Court has considered the above Stipulation, and good cause appearing
8
therefore, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: the deadline for Plaintiff to file a motion for
9
attorneys’ fees and expenses under Local Rule 293(a) is hereby extended to be the same as the
10
deadline for filing an application for fees under EAJA. Plaintiff shall file any application or
11
motion for attorneys’ fees no later than no later than thirty days after this Court’s amended
12
judgment becomes non-appealable.
13
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
Dated: April 12, 2011____
_/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill___
Lawrence J. O’Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
LEGAL_US_W # 67665425.1
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2Case No. C 09-00392 LJO
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION
REGARDING FEES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?