San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. Salazar et al

Filing 1144

ORDER on Stipulation and Order Regarding Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Other Expenses, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/11/15: The Parties' stipulation as set forth is approved. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 THE DELTA SMELT CASES Case No. 1:09-cv-407-LJO-BAM 1:09-cv-422-LJO-DLB 1:09-cv-631-LJO-DLB 1:09-cv-892-LJO-DLB SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER 6 AUTHORITY, et al. v. SALAZAR, et al. (Case No. 1:09-cv-407) 7 STATE WATER CONTRACTORS v. 8 SALAZAR, et al. (Case No. 1:09-cv-422) Partially Consolidated With: 1:09-cv-480-LJO-GSA 1:09-cv-1201-LJO-DLB 9 COALITION FOR A SUSTAINABLE DELTA, et al. v. UNITED STATES FISH 10 AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, et al. (Case No. 1:09-cv-480) 11 METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT v. 12 UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, et al. (Case No. 1:09-cv-631) 13 STEWART & JASPER ORCHARDS, et al. v. 14 UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, et al. (Case No. 1:09-cv-892) 15 FAMILY FARM ALLIANCE v. SALAZAR, 16 et al. (Case No. 1:09-cv-1201) STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND OTHER EXPENSES Judge: Hon. Lawrence J. O’Neill 17 18 To facilitate settlement discussions regarding Plaintiff San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water 19 20 21 Authority’s (“Authority”) claim for attorneys’ fees and other expenses in this case, the Authority and Defendants Sally Jewell, Secretary of Interior, et al. (“Federal Defendants”) jointly move this Court to stay briefing on the Authority’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and other 22 expenses for 149 days. In support of this motion, the Authority and Federal Defendants stipulate 23 as follows: 24 1. The Court entered judgment in this action on March 29, 2011. Doc. 851. The 25 Natural Resources Defense Council and The Bay Institute filed a Notice of Appeal on April 7, 26 2011. Doc. 853. The Judgment was subsequently amended on May 18, 2011. Doc. 884. On June 27 10, 2011, the Court entered an order extending the deadline for filing a motion for attorneys’ fees, 28 1193323.1 10355-024 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND OTHER EXPENSES 1 costs and other expenses to “subsequent to the entry of a final order disposing of any appeal” in 2 accordance with applicable law. Doc. 907. Federal Defendants filed a Notice of Appeal on July 3 1, 2011. Doc. 937. The Authority filed a Notice of Cross-Appeal on July 1, 2011. Doc. 939. The 4 Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its opinion on the appeals and cross-appeal on March 13, 5 2014. Doc. 1117; San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Auth. v. Jewell, 747 F.3d 581 (9th Cir. 2014). 6 On April 17, 2014 the Ninth Circuit issued an order extending the time for filing a petition for 7 rehearing en banc. Doc. 1122. On May 12, 2014, the Authority timely filed a petition for 8 rehearing en banc with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. On July 23, 2014, the Ninth Circuit 9 issued an order denying the Authority’s petition for rehearing en banc. Doc. 1129. On October 1, 10 2014 this Court issued an Amended Judgment, in response to the Ninth Circuit’s opinion. Doc. 11 1135. On October 6, 2014, the Authority filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the Supreme 12 Court of the United States, seeking review of the Ninth Circuit’s opinion. On January 12, 2015, 13 the Supreme Court issued an order denying the petition for writ of certiorari, and that order 14 represents the “final order disposing of any appeal” and is date of “final judgment” in this action. 15 See Doc. 907; see also 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B). 16 2. Concurrently with this joint motion and stipulation, the Authority has filed a 17 motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and other expenses for this litigation. Before filing the 18 motion for award of attorneys’ fees and other expenses, the Authority presented Federal 19 Defendants with a confidential request to settle its claim, which request includes the amount 20 sought to date, an itemized statement of the actual time expended by attorneys, experts, and other 21 personnel representing or appearing on behalf of the Authority, the rates at which fees and other 22 expenses were computed, and an itemized statement of other expenses incurred in the litigation. 23 Federal Defendants are, thus, in receipt of the information specified by the Equal Access to Justice 24 Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B), as well as Local Rule 293, and will not be prejudiced 25 by the Authority deferring the filing of memoranda, evidentiary and other materials supporting its 26 motion at this time. 27 3. Discussions regarding the Authority’s request are ongoing, and the Authority and 28 1193323.1 10355-024 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND OTHER EXPENSES 1 Federal Defendants seek additional time to attempt to settle the Authority’s claims without 2 unnecessarily burdening the Court. The Authority and Federal Defendants agree that briefing and 3 argument on the Authority’s claim for fees and other expenses may be unnecessary in light of the 4 parties’ intent to attempt to settle the Authority’s claim. 5 4. Accordingly, the Authority and Federal Defendants agree that further proceedings 6 on the Authority’s motion for an award of fees and other expenses, including the filing of further 7 memoranda and evidentiary and other materials supporting that motion, and any opposition 8 thereafter, should be stayed for 149 days to allow for settlement discussions. 9 5. At the conclusion of 149 days, the Authority and Federal Defendants will apprise 10 the Court of any settlement or further requested action, or jointly propose a briefing schedule to 11 address the Authority’s motion for fees and other expenses if there has been no settlement. That 12 schedule will provide for the Authority to supplement its motion for award of attorneys’ fees and 13 other expenses with documentation of all time and expenses sought, including the additional time 14 spent in seeking fees, opposition by the Federal Defendants, and reply by the Authority, with a 15 hearing if the Court deems a hearing necessary. 16 Based on the joint stipulation set forth above, the parties respectfully request that this 17 Court stay briefing and argument on the Authority’s concurrently filed motion for an award of 18 attorneys’ fees and other expenses for 149 days from the date of the Court’s order granting such 19 stay, in the manner provided above. 20 Respectfully submitted this 11th day of February, 2015. 21 22 Dated: February 10, 2015 DIEPENBROCK ELKIN, LLP A Professional Corporation 23 24 By: 25 26 /s/ Eileen M. Diepenbrock Eileen M. Diepenbrock Attorneys for Plaintiff, SAN LUIS & DELTAMENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY 27 28 1193323.1 10355-024 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND OTHER EXPENSES 1 Dated: February 10, 2015 2 KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDEMANN & GIRARD A Professional Corporation 3 By: 4 5 6 /s/ Daniel J. O’Hanlon Daniel J. O’Hanlon Attorneys for Plaintiff, SAN LUIS & DELTAMENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY 7 8 Dated: February 10, 2015 9 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Environmental & Natural Resources Division 10 11 By: 12 /s/ William Shapiro William Shapiro, Trial Attorney Attorneys for FEDERAL DEFENDANTS 13 14 15 ORDER The Parties’ stipulation as set forth above is approved. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill February 11, 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1193323.1 10355-024 4 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND OTHER EXPENSES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?