San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. Salazar et al
Filing
1152
THIRD STIPULATION and ORDER Regarding Motion for Attorney's Fees and Other Expenses signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/14/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
1 DANIEL J. O’HANLON, State Bar No. 122380
HANSPETER WALTER, State Bar No. 244847
2 REBECCA R. AKROYD, State Bar No. 267305
ELIZABETH L. LEEPER, State Bar No. 280451
3 KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDEMANN & GIRARD
400 Capitol Mall, 27th Floor
4 Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 321-4500
5 Facsimile: (916) 321-4555
6 EILEEN M. DIEPENBROCK, State Bar No. 119254
DAVID A. DIEPENBROCK, State Bar No. 215679
7 JONATHAN R. MARZ, State Bar No. 221188
DIEPENBROCK ELKIN, LLP
8 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 2200
Sacramento, California 95814
9 Telephone: (916) 492-5000
Facsimile: (916) 446-2640
10
Attorneys for Plaintiff, SAN LUIS & DELTA11 MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
THE DELTA SMELT CASES
16
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER
17 AUTHORITY, et al. v. SALAZAR, et al.
(Case No. 1:09-cv-407)
18
STATE WATER CONTRACTORS v.
19 SALAZAR, et al. (Case No. 1:09-cv-422)
20 COALITION FOR A SUSTAINABLE
DELTA, et al. v. UNITED STATES FISH
21 AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, et al. (Case No.
1:09-cv-480)
22
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT v.
23 UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE
SERVICE, et al. (Case No. 1:09-cv-631)
24
STEWART & JASPER ORCHARDS, et al. v.
25 UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE
SERVICE, et al. (Case No. 1:09-cv-892)
26
FAMILY FARM ALLIANCE v. SALAZAR,
27 et al. (Case No. 1:09-cv-1201)
Case No. 1:09-cv-407-LJO-BAM
1:09-cv-422-LJO-DLB
1:09-cv-631-LJO-DLB
1:09-cv-892-LJO-DLB
Partially Consolidated With:
1:09-cv-480-LJO-GSA
1:09-cv-1201-LJO-DLB
THIRD STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING MOTION FOR
ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND OTHER
EXPENSES
The Hon. Lawrence J. O’Neill
28
THIRD STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND OTHER
EXPENSES
1
To facilitate settlement discussions regarding Plaintiff San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water
2 Authority’s (“Authority”) claim for attorneys’ fees and other expenses in this case, the Authority
3 and Defendants Sally Jewell, Secretary of Interior, et al. (“Federal Defendants”) have twice before
4 stipulated to, and the Court has ordered, a stay on briefing and argument of the Authority’s motion
5 for attorneys’ fees and other expenses. Doc. 1144, Doc.1149. These parties have now reached a
6 recommended agreement in principle to settle the Authority’s fees claim, subject to review within
7 the Department of Justice and the Department of the Interior. To allow time for the review of the
8 proposed settlement, the Authority and Federal Defendants jointly request that this Court extend
9 the stay on Authority’s motion for attorneys’ fees and other expenses for an additional 90 days, to
10 December 15, 2015. The parties are requesting the same extension of a stay on the Authority’s
11 pending motion for attorneys’ fees in the Consolidated Salmon Cases, Case 1:09-cv-1053-LJO12 BAM, which these parties have likewise settled in principle.
13
In support of this request, the Authority and Federal Defendants stipulate as follows:
14
1.
On February 10, 2015, the Authority filed a motion for an award of attorneys’ fees
15 and other expenses for this litigation. Doc. 1137.
16
2.
On February 11, 2015, the Court approved the parties’ stipulation to stay further
17 briefing and argument on the Authority’s motion for attorneys’ fees and other expenses until July
18 10, 2015, to allow for settlement discussions. Doc. 1144.
19
3.
On June 5, 2015 the Court approved the parties’ stipulation regarding the motion
20 for attorneys’ fees and other expenses, under which the parties agreed to stay briefing and
21 argument on the Authority’s motion for attorneys’ fees until September 15, 2015. Doc. 1149.
22 That order directed the parties to apprise the Court of any settlement or further requested action, or
23 jointly propose a briefing schedule to address the Authority’s motion for fees and other expenses if
24 there was no settlement, by the expiration of the stay.
25
4.
The Authority and Federal Defendants have reached a recommended agreement in
26 principle to settle the Authority’s claim for fees and expenses. Before any settlement can be
27 concluded however, the proposed settlement terms must be reviewed and approved within the
28 Department of Justice and the Department of the Interior. If the recommended agreement is
1316259.1 10355-024
1
THIRD STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND OTHER
EXPENSES
1 eventually adopted, the Authority and Federal Defendants agree that further briefing and argument
2 on the Authority’s claim for fees and other expenses, and a decision by the Court, will be
3 unnecessary. A stay will therefore conserve the parties’ and the Court’s resources.
4
5.
Based on the joint stipulation set forth above, the parties respectfully request that
5 this Court extend the stay of briefing and argument on the Authority’s motion for attorneys’ fees
6 and other expenses until December 15, 2015. By that date, the parties will either report that
7 settlement has been completed and the Authority is withdrawing its motion for fees and expenses,
8 or request other action by the Court in the absence of a completed settlement.
9
Respectfully submitted this 14th day of September, 2015.
10 Dated: September 14, 2015
11
DIEPENBROCK ELKIN, LLP
A Professional Corporation
By:
12
13
/s/ Eileen M. Diepenbrock
Eileen M. Diepenbrock
Attorneys for Plaintiff, SAN LUIS & DELTAMENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY
14
15 Dated: September 14, 2015
16
KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDEMANN & GIRARD
A Professional Corporation
By:
17
18
19
20
Dated: September 14, 2015
/s/ Daniel J. O’Hanlon
Daniel J. O’Hanlon
Attorneys for Plaintiff, SAN LUIS & DELTAMENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Environmental & Natural Resources Division
21
By:
22
23
/s/ William Shapiro
William Shapiro, Trial Attorney
Attorneys for FEDERAL DEFENDANTS
24
25 IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
September 14, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
1316259.1 10355-024
2
THIRD STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND OTHER
EXPENSES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?