Sherman v. Gonzalez et al

Filing 76

ORDER Denying 68 Plaintiff's Motion to Review and Amend Statements Made in Plaintiff's Deposition, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 8/19/11. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 BRANDON L. SHERMAN, 10 11 12 13 CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00420-LJO-GBC PC Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REVIEW AND AMEND STATEMENTS MADE IN PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION v. F. GONZALES, et al., (Doc. 68) Defendants. 14 / 15 16 17 Plaintiff Brandon L. Sherman (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 On July 26, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting that the Court to allow Plaintiff to 19 review the transcript of his deposition in order to amend statements he made in the deposition. (Doc. 20 68). On August 9, 2011, Defendants filed an opposition. (Doc. 70). 21 According to Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: 22 24 On request by the deponent or a party before the deposition is completed, the deponent must be allowed 30 days after being notified by the officer that the transcript or recording is available in which: to review the transcript or recording; and if there are changes in form or substance, to sign a statement reciting such changes and the reasons given by the deponent for making them. 25 Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 30(e). Plaintiff’s deposition took place February 23, 2011. (Doc. 66-4). Only after 26 Defendants filed a cross-motion for summary judgment containing excerpts from the deposition does 27 Plaintiff seek to amend his statements in the deposition. The time in which Plaintiff had to review 28 and amend statements in the deposition has long passed and Plaintiff does not provide any 23 1 1 compelling argument as to why his motion should be granted. Based on the foregoing, the Court 2 hereby orders that Plaintiff’s motion filed on July 26, 2011, is DENIED. (Doc. 68). 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: 0jh02o August 19, 2011 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?