Sherman v. Gonzalez et al
Filing
76
ORDER Denying 68 Plaintiff's Motion to Review and Amend Statements Made in Plaintiff's Deposition, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 8/19/11. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
BRANDON L. SHERMAN,
10
11
12
13
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00420-LJO-GBC PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO REVIEW AND AMEND STATEMENTS
MADE IN PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION
v.
F. GONZALES, et al.,
(Doc. 68)
Defendants.
14
/
15
16
17
Plaintiff Brandon L. Sherman (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
18
On July 26, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting that the Court to allow Plaintiff to
19
review the transcript of his deposition in order to amend statements he made in the deposition. (Doc.
20
68). On August 9, 2011, Defendants filed an opposition. (Doc. 70).
21
According to Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:
22
24
On request by the deponent or a party before the deposition is completed, the
deponent must be allowed 30 days after being notified by the officer that the
transcript or recording is available in which: to review the transcript or recording; and
if there are changes in form or substance, to sign a statement reciting such changes
and the reasons given by the deponent for making them.
25
Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 30(e). Plaintiff’s deposition took place February 23, 2011. (Doc. 66-4). Only after
26
Defendants filed a cross-motion for summary judgment containing excerpts from the deposition does
27
Plaintiff seek to amend his statements in the deposition. The time in which Plaintiff had to review
28
and amend statements in the deposition has long passed and Plaintiff does not provide any
23
1
1
compelling argument as to why his motion should be granted. Based on the foregoing, the Court
2
hereby orders that Plaintiff’s motion filed on July 26, 2011, is DENIED. (Doc. 68).
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated:
0jh02o
August 19, 2011
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?