Carlin et al v. DairyAmerica, Inc. et al

Filing 130

ORDER vacating hearing date of May 13, 2013 and taking matter under submission. signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/8/13. (Nazaroff, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

GERALD CARLIN, JOHN RAHM,
PAUL ROZWADOWSKI, and BRIAN
WOLFE, individually and on behalf of
themselves and others similarly situated,

)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
DAIRY AMERICA, INC., and
)
CALIFORNIA DAIRIES, INC.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)

1:09-CV-00430-AWI-GSA
ORDER VACATING HEARING
DATE OF MAY 13, 2013, AND
TAKING MATTER UNDER
SUBMISSION

17
18

In this action for damages, Defendant California Dairies, Inc. (“Defendant”) has noticed a

19

renewed motion to dismiss each of Plaintiffs’ four complaints consolidated under the above-

20

captioned case number pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

21

Hearing on Defendant’s motion to dismiss was scheduled to be held on May 13, 2013. The court

22

has preliminarily reviewed Defendant’s motion, Plaintiffs’ Opposition and Defendant’s reply.

23

The court finds that the press of other matters before the court prevents an adequate review of the

24

legal issues presented within the time normally contemplated in the court’s scheduling order.

25

The court also finds that, at present, Defendant’s motion to dismiss appears to be suitable for

26

decision without oral argument. Local Rule 78-230(h). The court will therefore proceed with

27

consideration of Defendant’s motion to dismiss at the earliest possible time and will notify the

28

parties to reschedule a hearing on the motion if and when the court finds that such hearing would

1

be helpful to the court’s determination.

2
3

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of May 13,

4

2013, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of May 13, 2013, the Court will

5

take the matter under submission, and will thereafter issue its decision or will notify the parties

6

of the need to reschedule oral argument as the court deems appropriate.

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10

Dated:
0m8i78

May 8, 2013
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2