Carlin et al v. DairyAmerica, Inc. et al
Filing
154
STIPULATION and ADDENDUM to Protective Order Regarding the Production of Protected Materials signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/9/2014. (Martinez, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
10
11
Allison A. Davis (# 139203)
Sanjay Nangia (# 264986)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94110
Telephone: (415) 276-6500
Facsimile: (415) 276-6599
allisondavis@dwt.com
sanjaynangia@dwt.com
Charles M. English, pro hac vice
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
1919 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20006-3402
Telephone: (202) 973-4200
Facsimile: (202) 973-4499
chipenglish@dwt.com
Attorneys for Defendant, DAIRYAMERICA, INC.
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
FRESNO DIVISION
16
17
18
GERALD CARLIN, JOHN RAHM, PAUL
ROZWADOWSKI and BRIAN WOLFE,
individually and on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated,
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
20
21
22
23
v.
DAIRYAMERICA, INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 1:09-CV-00430-AWI-GSA
STIPULATION AND ADDENDUM TO
PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING
THE PRODUCTION OF PROTECTED
MATERIALS
24
The parties’ responses to discovery requests in the above-captioned case may require the
25
production of large volumes of electronic and hard copy documents and data in their possession,
26
custody, or control. To expedite the production of responsive information, the parties agree that
27
production may be made subject to the following clawback agreement, and as contemplated by
28
section 11 of the protective order entered in this action (Dkt. No. 129). Disclosure of information
1
STIPULATION AND ADDENDUM TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 1:09-CV-00430-AWI-DLB
DWT 23866068v1 0090114-000001
DWT 23357992v1 0090114-000001
1
subject to a claim of attorney-client privilege or the protection of the attorney work product
2
doctrine during the course of discovery shall be deemed unintentional unless the parties expressly
3
agree otherwise, all discovery responses are made with the express reservation and without
4
waiving, and without intending to waive, the designation of “confidential” as set forth in the
5
protective order entered in this action (Dkt. 129), the protection of the attorney-client privilege, the
6
attorney work product doctrine, state privacy protections or other applicable privileges.
7
8
9
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
10
Accordingly, plaintiffs GERALD CARLIN, JOHN RAHM, PAUL ROZWADOWSKI and
DIANA WOLFE, individually and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, and
Defendant DAIRYAMERICA INC., hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1.
The disclosure or production of any information or document without inspection or
11
designation of a “CONFIDENTIAL” legend, as contemplated in sec. 5.2 of the protective order
12
entered in this action (Dkt. No. 129), will not be deemed to waive a producing party’s or
13
producing third party’s claim to designate information as Confidential as set forth in section 5.3 of
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
the entered protective order (Dkt. No. 129).
2.
As used herein, the term “Protected Private Information” means information
pertaining to an individual which qualifies for protection from disclosure under California state
privacy law. The parties agree not to object to the disclosure of information that pertains to any
corporation or other organization on the basis that it constitutes Protected Private Information.
The parties further agree not to object to the disclosure of any financial information on the basis
that it constitutes Protected Private Information unless such information pertains to the personal
financial records of an individual and is unrelated to the pricing of any dairy product.
3.
The disclosure or production of any information or document that is subject to an
objection on the basis of attorney-client privilege, work-product protection, Protected Private
24
Information, or other applicable privileges (collectively, “Protected Information”) will not be
25
deemed to waive a producing party’s or producing third party’s claim to its privileged or protected
26
nature (“Protection”) or estop that party or the privileged holder from designating the information
27
or document as Protected Information at a later date.
28
2
STIPULATION AND ADDENDUM TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 1:09-CV-00430-AWI-DLB
DWT 23866068v1 0090114-000001
DWT 23357992v1 0090114-000001
1
4.
A producing party or producing third party may request the return of any Protected
Information by submitting such request in writing, identifying the document and asserting the
3
basis for Protection. In the event that only part(s) of a document or other information is claimed to
4
contain Protected Information, the producing party shall furnish a redacted copy of such
5
document, removing only the part(s) thereof claimed to be Protected Information. The receiving
6
party shall determine in good faith whether to contest the basis for asserting Protection and to
7
either (a) return or destroy all copies of the Protected Information and provide certification to the
8
producing party of same, or (b) provide notification to the producing party in writing of an
9
objection to the assertion of Protection and the grounds for that objection. The receiving party
10
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
2
may examine the Protected Information to the extent necessary to determine if the document is
11
Protected. If the receiving party objects to the assertion of Protection, the parties shall meet and
12
confer in accordance with L.R. 251 and the Court’s motion practice procedures with regard to
13
discovery disputes. In the event the parties are unable to resolve the dispute, the receiving party
14
may request an informal conference with the Court to seek appropriate relief or move for relief
15
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37. The Protected Information subject to dispute shall not be used for
16
any purpose in this litigation until the Court determines its status.
17
18
19
20
21
22
5.
To the extent a producing party produces personal address or other contact
information for an employee, former employee, or member of the producing party, the receiving
party expressly agrees not to contact the individual until the producing party has a reasonable
opportunity to determine if the individual will be represented by the producing party’s counsel.
6.
Entry of this Stipulation and Addendum to Protective Order does not alter any
party’s burden in establishing or challenging claims of Protected Information.
23
7.
Entry of this Stipulation and Addendum to Protective Order does not waive the
24
right of the receiving party to assert the producing party failed to timely request the return of
25
Protected Information.
26
27
28
8.
Entry of this Stipulation and Addendum to Protective Order does not alter the
obligation of the receiving party to comply with its ethical and legal obligations, as set forth under
3
STIPULATION AND ADDENDUM TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 1:09-CV-00430-AWI-DLB
DWT 23866068v1 0090114-000001
DWT 23357992v1 0090114-000001
1
applicable law, concerning the receipt of material that obviously appears to be Protected
2
Information.
3
4
5
9.
Entry of this Stipulation and Addendum to Protective Order does not waive any
objection otherwise available to a party or non-party under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
10.
Entry of this Stipulation and Addendum to Protective Order does not preclude or
restrict the right of any party to perform a review for the purpose of identifying Protected
7
Information and withholding documents containing Protected Information in accordance with the
8
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governing the non-production of documents claimed to be
9
Protected.
10
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
6
11.
11
Entry of this Stipulation and Addendum to Protective Order does not otherwise
alter the terms of the protective order entered in this action (Dkt. No. 129).
12
13
14
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: April 9, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
15
/s/ Sanjay M. Nangia
16
17
18
19
20
21
Allison A. Davis (# 139203)
Sanjay M. Nangia (# 264986)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94110
Telephone: (415) 275-6580
Facsimile: (415) 276 4880
allisondavis@dwt.com
sanjaynangia@dwt.com
22
26
Charles M. English, pro hac vice
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
1919 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20006-3402
Telephone: (202 973-4200
Facsimile (202) 973-4499
chipenglish@dwt.com
27
Counsel for Defendant DairyAmerica, Inc.
23
24
25
28
4
STIPULATION AND ADDENDUM TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 1:09-CV-00430-AWI-DLB
DWT 23866068v1 0090114-000001
DWT 23357992v1 0090114-000001
1
2
/s/ Anthony D. Phillips (as authorized on April 9, 2014)
3
Joseph J. Tabacco, JR. #5484
Christopher T. Heffelfinger #118058
Anthony D. Phillips #259688
BERMAN DeVALERIO
One California Street, Suite 900
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 433-3200
Facsimile: (415) 433-6382
jtabacco@bermandevalerio.com
cheffelfinger@bermandevalerio.com
aphillips@bermandevalerio.com
4
5
6
7
8
9
Benjamin D. Brown #202545
Brent F. Johnson
George F. Farah
COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL, PLLC
1100 New York Avenue, Suite 500 West
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: (202) 408-4600
Facsimile: (202) 408-4699
bbrown@cohenmilstein.com
bjohnson@cohenmilstein.com
gfarah@cohenmilstein.com
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
10
11
12
13
14
15
Lynn L. Sarko
Mark A. Griffin
Juli E. Farris
KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: (206) 623-1900
Facsimile: (206) 623-3384
lsarko@kellerrohrback.com
mgriffin@keller rohrback.com
jfarris@kellerohrback.com
16
17
18
19
20
21
Ron Kilgard
KELLER ROHRBACK P.L.C.
3101 North Central Avenue, Suite 1400
Phoenix, AZ 85012
Telephone: (602) 248-0088
Facsimile: (602) 248-2822
rkilgard@kellerrohrback.com
22
23
24
25
Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class
26
Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Proposed C
27
28
5
STIPULATION AND ADDENDUM TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 1:09-CV-00430-AWI-DLB
DWT 23866068v1 0090114-000001
DWT 23357992v1 0090114-000001
1
2
3
4
5
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 131(E)
I, Sanjay M. Nangia, attest that Andrew D. Phillips, counsel for Plaintiffs and the Proposed
Class, authorized me to submit this document on his behalf.
DATED: April 9, 2014
/s/ Sanjay M. Nangia
Sanjay M. Nangia
6
7
8
9
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
STIPULATION AND ADDENDUM TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 1:09-CV-00430-AWI-DLB
DWT 23866068v1 0090114-000001
DWT 23357992v1 0090114-000001
1
ADDENDUM TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
2
3
4
Upon a review of the agreement of the parties outlined above, the Court adopts the
stipulation.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated:
April 9, 2014
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
STIPULATION AND ADDENDUM TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 1:09-CV-00430-AWI-DLB
DWT 23866068v1 0090114-000001
DWT 23357992v1 0090114-000001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?