Carlin et al v. DairyAmerica, Inc. et al

Filing 323

STIPULATION and ORDER to Extend Time to Respond to Third Amended Complaint, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/7/2016. (Kusamura, W)

1 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
JOHN J. VLAHOS, SBN 32673
2 [e-mail]
LAWRENCE M. CIRELLI, SBN 114710
3 [e-mail]
MEGAN OLIVER THOMPSON, SBN 256654
4 [e-mail]
SHANNON M. NESSIER, SBN 267644
5 [e-mail]
6 425 Market Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
[phone]
7 Telephone:
Facsimile:
[phone]
8
Attorneys for Defendant
9 CALIFORNIA DAIRIES, INC.
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

GERALD CARLIN, JOHN RAHM, PAUL
13 ROZWADOWSKI and DIANA WOLFE,
individually and all others similarly situated,
14
Plaintiffs,
15
v.
16
DAIRY AMERICA, INC., and CALIFORNIA
17 DAIRIES, INC.,
18

CASE NO. 1:09 CV 00430-AWI

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants.
Action Filed: March 6, 2009

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12501680.2

1
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

Case No. 1:09 CV 00430-AWI

1

Pursuant to Rule 6-143 of the General Local Rules of the above titled Court, Plaintiffs,

2 individually and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated (“Plaintiffs”), and
3 Defendants DairyAmerica, Inc. (“DairyAmerica”) and California Dairies, Inc. (“California
4 Dairies”) (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their respective attorneys of record,
5 (collectively, the “Parties”) hereby stipulate to the following:
6

RECITALS

7

Whereas Plaintiffs filed a Third Amended Complaint on February 10, 2016;

8

Whereas Defendants filed concurrent Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Amended

9 Complaint, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), on March 30, 2016;
10

Whereas the Court filed its Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ Motions

11 to Dismiss on May 2, 2016;
12

Whereas Defendants filed concurrent Motions for Reconsideration of the Order on

13 Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss on May 16, 2016;
14

Whereas the Court filed an Order denying Defendants’ Motions for Reconsideration on

15 June 23, 2016;
16

Whereas, following the Court’s Order denying Defendants’ Motions for Reconsideration,

17 the deadline for Defendants to each respond to the Third Amended Complaint was July 7, 2016;
18

Whereas, given the intervening national holiday and the complexity and length of

19 Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint, Defendants sought an extension of time to respond thereto;
20

Whereas, Plaintiffs have agreed to provide Defendants with an extension to the deadline to

21 respond to the Third Amended Complaint.
22
23

STIPULATION
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the Parties, through their

24 respective counsel of record, as follows:
25

1.

The deadline for Defendants to respond to the Third Amended Complaint shall be

26 extended by 11 days, up to and including July 18, 2016;
27

2.

This stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by

28 Court order.
12501680.2

2
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2 DATED: July 7, 2016

COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL, PLLC

3
By:

4
5

Benjamin D. Brown
George F. Farah
COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL,
PLLC
1100 New York Avenue, Suite 500 West
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6
7
8
9
10

Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr
Christopher T. Heffelfinger
Chowning Poppler
BERMAN DeVALERIO
One California Street, Suite 900
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

11
12
13
14
15
16

Mark A. Griffin
Cari Laufenberg
Raymond Farrow
KELLER ROHRBACK LLP
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
claufenberg@keller rohrback.com
[e-mail]

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

/s/ George F. Farah

Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class
///
///
///
///
///

28
12501680.2

3
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

1 Dated: July 7, 2016

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

By:

/s/ Charles M. English
Charles M. English
Charles M. English Pro Hac Vice
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
1919 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20006-3402
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile (202 973-4499
[e-mail]
Allison A. Davis
Sanjay M. Nangia
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Joseph M. Marchini
BAKER MANOCK & JENSEN, PC
5260 North Palm Avenue,
Fourth Floor
Fresno, CA 93704
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendant DairyAmerica, Inc.

19
20 / / /
21 / / /
22 / / /
23 / / /
24 / / /
25 / / /
26 / / /
27 / / /
28 / / /
12501680.2

4
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

1 Dated: July 7, 2016

HANSON BRIDGETT LLP

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

By:

/s/ Lawrence M. Cirelli
John J. Vlahos
Lawrence M. Cirelli
Megan Oliver Thompson
Shannon M. Nessier
425 Market Street, Suite 2600
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

10
11

Counsel for Defendant California Dairies, Inc.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12501680.2

5
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

1

ORDER

2 The Court adopts the Parties’ stipulation as follows:
3

1.

The deadline for Defendants to each respond to the Third Amended Complaint

4 shall be extended by 11 days, up to and including July 18, 2016;
5

2.

This stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by

6 Court order.
7
8 IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 Dated: July 7, 2016
10

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12501680.2

6
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER