Thomas v. Robles et al

Filing 94

ORDER Directing Defendant to Provide Proof of Service by the End of the Day, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/9/11. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LARRY D. THOMAS, CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00443-LJO-BAM PC 7 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO PROVIDE PROOF OF SERVICE BY THE END OF THE DAY 8 v. 9 HECTOR ROBLES, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 / 12 13 14 The Court has received and reviewed the Defendant's Trial Brief on the issue of the timing of the filing of the complaint pursuant to the requirements of the California Tort Claims Act. 15 The Court will issue a more detailed order when appropriate prior to the start of trial to allow 16 all parties to know which claims will go to the jury. The issue is whether or not the notice provided 17 pursuant to Government Code section 945.6, dated August 29, 2008, was actually mailed on that 18 date. If it was, then the complaint as to the state causes of action are untimely, in that the 5 day 19 mailing rule does not apply to extend the time for the filing of the complaint. (Citations to follow 20 in the more detailed order that will be issued once the defense provides the requested declaration.) 21 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than the end of the day TODAY, the 22 defense is required to provide a proof of service to show when the 945.6 notice was in fact mailed, 23 and such proof shall be filed with this court by electronic filing AND FAX at 559-499-5959. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: b9ed48 December 9, 2011 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?