Hollis v. York et al
Filing
47
ORDER Vacating 41 Findings and Recommendations Recommending this Action be Dismissed; ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Request to have Cover Page of Complaint Originally Filed in 1:11-cv-00749 OWW GSA Replaced and Directing Complaint be Filed as a Second Amended Complaint in this Action; ORDER Directing Clerk's Office to Close Case 1:11-cv-00749 OWW GSA signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 08/03/2011. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
MICHAEL EUGENE HOLLIS,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00463-OWW-SMS
ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING
THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED
v.
RUSSELL YORK, et al.,
(ECF No. 41.)
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST
TO HAVE COVER PAGE OF COMPLAINT
ORIGINALLY FILED IN 1:11-CV-00749OWW-GSA REPLACED AND DIRECTING
COMPLAINT BE FILED AS A SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT IN THIS ACTION
14
15
16
(ECF Nos. 46, 45)
17
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO
CLOSE CASE 1:11-cv-00749-OWW-GSA
18
/
19
20
Plaintiff Michael Eugene Hollis (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in
21
forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal
22
Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999 (1971), which provides a remedy for violation of
23
civil rights by federal actors. On April 1, 2011, an order issued dismissing Plaintiff’s first amended
24
complaint and granting him thirty days to file a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 39.) On June
25
7, 2011, findings and recommendations issued recommending this action be dismissed for Plaintiff’s
26
failure to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 41.) Plaintiff filed objections on June 20, 2011,
27
stating that he had mailed several complaints to the court, including a complaint to be filed in this
28
action. (ECF No. 42.) On June 23, 2011, the Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to notify the
1
1
Court which of his complaints was to have been the second amended complaint in this action. (ECF
2
No. 44.) On July 11, 2011, Plaintiff filed a response stating that case opened as case no. 1:11-cv-
3
00749-OWW-GSA was the complaint that was to be filed in this action and requests the Court to
4
replace the first page of the complaint. (ECF No. 46.) On July 15, 2011, Plaintiff filed a revised
5
cover page to the complaint. (ECF No. 45.)
6
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
7
1.
8
The findings and recommendations, filed June 7, 2011, recommending this action
be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order are VACATED;
9
2.
Plaintiff’s request to replace the first page of the complaint is GRANTED and the
10
Clerk’s Office is directed to replace the first page of the complaint filed May 10,
11
2011, in 1:11-cv-00749-OWW-GSA with the revised page filed in this action on July
12
15, 2011;
13
3.
14
The complaint filed in 1:11-cv-00749-OWW-GSA shall be filed in this action as a
second amended complaint;
15
4.
A copy of this order shall be filed in case no. 1:11-cv-00749-OWW-GSA; and
16
5.
Case 1:11-cv-00749-OWW-GSA shall be closed as a duplicate action.
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
Dated:
icido3
August 3, 2011
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?