Saenz v. Spearman, et al.
Filing
141
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion to File his Exhibits for Jury Trial set for June 18, 2013, as Moot 131 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/20/13. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT SAENZ,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
SGT. D. REEVES,
15
Defendant.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:09-cv-00557-BAM (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
FILE HIS EXHIBITS FOR JURY TRIAL SET FOR
JUNE 18, 2013, AS MOOT
(ECF No. 131)
Plaintiff Robert Gonzales Saenz (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
18
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against
19
Defendant Reeves for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment and deliberate indifference to
20
conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The matter is set for jury trial on
21
June 18, 2013.
22
On May 15, 2013, Plaintiff filed the instant motion to file his intended exhibits/evidence for
23
jury trial. Plaintiff also forwarded his exhibits to the Court. (ECF No. 131.) Plaintiff’s motion to file
24
his exhibits is unnecessary. Pursuant to the Pretrial Order issued on April 16, 2013, the parties are
25
required to submit their proposed trial exhibits to Courtroom Deputy Harriet Herman no later than
26
May 31, 2013. (ECF No. 123, p. 21.) The parties are not required to file their exhibits unless
27
otherwise necessary for any motions in limine. At this time, Plaintiff’s trial exhibits will be forwarded
28
1
1
to the Courtroom Deputy in anticipation of trial. Plaintiff’s motion to file his trial exhibits is therefore
2
DENIED as moot.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
May 20, 2013
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?