Stanislaus Food Products Company v. USS-POSCO Industries

Filing 168

ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, PITCAL, INC., POSCO AMERICA STEEL CORPORATION, POSCO-CALIFORNIA CORPORATION FOR AN ORDER ALLOWING THEM TO FILE THE MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on May 10, 2010. (Lira, I)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 RIVER PARK PLACE EAST FRESNO, CA 93720-1501 Mandy L. Jeffcoach, # 232313 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP 5 River Park Place East Fresno, CA 93720-1501 Telephone: (559) 433-1300 Facsimile: (559) 433-2300 Daniel I. Booker (admitted pro hac vice) Alexander Y. Thomas (admitted pro hac vice) REED SMITH LLP 3110 Fairview Park Drive, Suite 1400 Falls Church, VA 22042 Telephone: (703) 641-4276 Facsimile: (703) 641-4340 Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION and PITCAL, INC. Reginald D. Steer (State Bar No. 56324) AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 580 California Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, CA 94104-1036 Facsimile: (415) 765-9501 Telephone: (415) 765-9520 Steven M. Pesner (admitted pro hac vice) John W. Berry (admitted pro hac vice) AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP One Bryant Park New York, NY 10036 Telephone: (212) 872-8075 Facsimile: (212) 872-7512 Attorneys for Defendants POSCO AMERICA STEEL CORPORATION and POSCO-CALIFORNIA CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (FRESNO DIVISION) STANISLAUS FOOD PRODUCTS COMPANY, a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. USS-POSCO INDUSTRIES, a California partnership; PITCAL, INC., a Delaware corporation; POSCO-CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; POSCO AMERICA STEEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendants. Case No. 1:09-cv-00560-LJO-SMS ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, PITCAL, INC., POSCO AMERICA STEEL CORPORATION, POSCO-CALIFORNIA CORPORATION FOR AN ORDER ALLOWING THEM TO FILE THE MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Date: Time: Ctrm.: Judge: July 15, 2010 8:30 a.m. 4, 7th Floor Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill Defendants UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation ("U.S. STEEL"), PITCAL, INC., a Delaware corporation ("PITCAL") POSCO AMERICA STEEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and POSCO-CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, a California corporation will (collectively "Joint Defendants") have filed a [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF U.S. STEEL CORPORATION, ET AL.. FOR AN ORDER ALLOWING THEM TO FILE THE MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER SEAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 RIVER PARK PLACE EAST FRESNO, CA 93720-1501 Joint Motion for Order Allowing Them to File their Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint and Supporting Documents Under Seal. This Court, having determined that there is good cause to protect the confidentiality of the information contained in the Motion to Dismiss, hereby GRANTS the Motion and directs the Clerk of the Court to file under seal the complete, unredacted versions of the Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof of U.S. STEEL and PITCAL. Within ten (10) days of service of this Order, these moving parties shall file a redacted copy of the motion and any supporting papers. The redactions shall be narrowly tailored to protect only that information that is confidential or was deemed confidential. For good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 10, 2010 __/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill_______________ Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Court Judge 88165/00000-1559670.v1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF U.S. STEEL CORPORATION, ET AL. FOR AN ORDER ALLOWING THEM TO FILE THE MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER SEAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?