Stanislaus Food Products Company v. USS-POSCO Industries
Filing
294
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST ALLOWING DEFENDANTS UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION AND PITCAL, INC. TO FILE UNDER SEAL CERTAIN PLEADINGS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on August 23, 2011. E-mail Address for Approved Sealed Document (see L.R. 141): ApprovedSealed@caed.uscourts.gov (Munoz, I)
1
2
3
4
5
Mandy L. Jeffcoach, # 232313
McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard,
Wayte & Carruth LLP
5 River Park Place East
Fresno, CA 93720-1501
Telephone:
(559) 433-1300
Facsimile:
(559) 433-2300
8
Daniel I. Booker (admitted pro hac vice)
Alexander Y. Thomas (admitted pro hac vice)
REED SMITH LLP
3110 Fairview Park Drive, Suite 1400
Falls Church, VA 22042
Telephone:
(703) 641-4276
Facsimile:
(703) 641-4340
9
Attorneys for Defendants
6
7
10
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION and
PITCAL, INC.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (FRESNO DIVISION)
14
15
STANISLAUS FOOD PRODUCTS
COMPANY, a California corporation,
16
Plaintiff,
17
v.
18
19
20
21
22
23
USS-POSCO INDUSTRIES, a California
partnership; PITCAL, INC., a Delaware
corporation; POSCO-CALIFORNIA
CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation;
UNITED STATES STEEL
CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation;
POSCO AMERICA STEEL
CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation,
Case No. 1:09-cv-00560-LJO-SMS
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST ALLOWING
DEFENDANTS UNITED STATES STEEL
CORPORATION AND PITCAL, INC. TO
FILE UNDER SEAL CERTAIN PLEADINGS
IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT; MEMORANDUM
OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN
SUPPORT THEREOF
Judge: Hon. Lawrence J. O’Neill
Defendants.
24
25
Defendants UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and
26
PITCAL, INC., a Delaware corporation (collectively “Defendants”) have filed a Request for
27
Order Allowing them to file under seal their (1) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in
28
Support of Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants United States Steel Corporation and
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW ,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
5 R IVER PARK PLACE EAST
FRESNO, CA 93720-1501
[PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING UNITED STATES STEEL, ET AL. TO FILE UNDER SEAL CERTAIN
PLEADINGS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
1
2
3
4
Pitcal, Inc., (2) Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment by
Defendants United States Steel Corporation and Pitcal, Inc., and (3) Declaration of Robert Y.
Kopf, III in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants United States Steel
Corporation and Pitcal, Inc. (collectively the “MSJ Pleadings ).
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
This Court, having determined that there is a good cause to protect the confidentiality of
the information contained in the MSJ Pleadings, hereby GRANTS the Defendants’ request and
directs the Clerk of the Court to file under seal the complete, unredacted versions of the
Defendants’ (1) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Summary
Judgment by Defendants United States Steel Corporation and Pitcal, Inc., (2) Statement of
Undisputed Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants United States
Steel Corporation and Pitcal, Inc., and (3) Declaration of Robert Y. Kopf, III in Support of
Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants United States Steel Corporation and Pitcal, Inc.
13
14
Within two (2) days of service of this Order, defendants shall file a redacted copy of their
papers. The redactions shall be narrowly tailored.
15
16
17
88165/00000-1791407.v1
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
21
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
August 23, 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
b9ed48bb
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW ,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
5 R IVER PARK PLACE EAST
FRESNO, CA 93720-1501
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING UNITED STATES STEEL, ET AL. TO FILE UNDER SEAL CERTAIN
PLEADINGS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?