Zamaro v. Moonga et al
Filing
74
AMENDED DISCOVERY ORDER; SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/6/12. Unenumerated Rule 12(b) Motions Deadline 4/6/2012, Deadline to Amend Pleadings: 6/4/2012, Discovery Cut-Off Date 7/6/2012, Dispositive Motions filed by 8/17/2012 (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
SAMMY ZAMARO,
10
11
12
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00580-BAM PC
Plaintiff,
AMENDED DISCOVERY ORDER
SCHEDULING ORDER
v.
Unenumerated Rule 12(b) Motion Deadline - April 6, 2012
Deadline to Amend Pleadings - June 4, 2012
Discovery Cut-Off Date - July 6, 2012
Dispositive Motion Deadline - August 17, 2012
G. MOONGA, et al.,
13
Defendants.
/
14
15
Defendant Martinez has answered the complaint filed on February 12, 2009. A discovery
16
and scheduling order issued on November 3, 2009, for Defendants Moonga and Akanno. This
17
amended scheduling order applies only to Defendant Martinez. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil
18
Procedure 1, 16, and 26-36, discovery shall proceed as follows:
19
1. Discovery requests shall be served by the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
20
Procedure 5 and Local Rule 135, and shall only be filed when required by Local Rules 250.2, 250.3,
21
and 250.4;
22
23
2. Responses to written discovery requests shall be due forty-five (45) days after the request
is first served;
24
3. To ensure that the responding party has forty-five (45) days after the request is first served
25
to respond, discovery requests must be served at least forty-five (45) days before the discovery
26
deadline;
27
4. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(B), defendants may depose plaintiff
28
and any other witness confined in a prison upon condition that, at least fourteen (14) days before
1
1
such a deposition, defendants serve all parties with the notice required by Federal Rule of Civil
2
Procedure 30(b)(1); and
3
5. If disputes arise about the parties’ obligations to respond to requests for discovery, the
4
parties shall comply with all pertinent rules including Rules 5, 7, 11, 26, and 37 of the Federal Rules
5
of Civil Procedure and Rules 110, 130, 131, 133, 135, 142, 144, and 230(l) of the Local Rules of
6
Practice for the United States District Court, Eastern District of California. Unless otherwise
7
ordered, Local Rule 251 shall not apply, and the requirement set forth in Federal Rules of Civil
8
Procedure 26 and 37 that a party seeking relief from the court certify that he or she has in good faith
9
conferred or attempted to confer with the other party or person in an effort to resolve the dispute
10
prior to seeking court action shall not apply. Voluntary compliance with this provision of Rules 26
11
and 37 is encouraged, however. A discovery motion that does not comply with all applicable rules
12
will be stricken and may result in imposition of sanctions.
13
Further:
14
6. The parties are advised that the deadline for filing motions to dismiss for failure to exhaust
15
the administrative remedies pursuant to the unenumerated portion of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
16
12(b) shall be April 6, 2012;
17
7. The deadline for amending the pleadings shall be June 4, 2012;
18
8. The parties are advised that the deadline for the completion of all discovery, including
19
filing motions to compel, shall be July 6, 2012;
20
9. The deadline for filing pre-trial dispositive motions shall be August 17, 2012;1
21
10. A request for an extension of a deadline set in this order must be filed on or before
22
23
24
25
the expiration of the deadline in question; and
11. Extensions of time will only be granted on a showing of good cause.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
cm411
February 6, 2012
/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
1
The pre-trial dispositive motion deadline does not apply to the filing of unenumerated Rule 12(b) motions
to dismiss for failure to exhaust. Unenumerated Rule 12(b) motions for failure to exhaust must be filed on or before
the deadline separately set forth in this order.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?