Strong v. Elliot

Filing 15

ORDER ADOPTING 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; Plaintiffs Thirteenth Amendment Claim is DISMISSED; This Action Shall Proceed Against Defendant Only on Plaintiffs Eighth AmendmentClaim.; and This Action is Referred to the Magistrate Judge for Further Proceedings, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/21/2010. (Marrujo, C)

(PC) Strong v. Elliot

Doc. 15

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. KENNETH ELLIOTT, Defendant. ________________________________/ Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 26, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Plaintiff and contained noticed that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. The twenty-one day period has since expired, and Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302, the Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. ///// ///// 1 ORDER DISMISSING THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT CLAIM (Doc. 14) GEORGE BERRY STRONG, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:09-cv-00583 AWI JLT (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge filed October 26, 2010, are adopted in full; 2. Plaintiff's Thirteenth Amendment claim is dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; 3. This action shall proceed against Defendant only on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim.; and 4. This action is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 December 21, 2010 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2