Wade v. Fresno Police Department et al
**DISCHARGED per 21 Order** ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/19/2009.Plaintiff is Ordered to Show Cause, if any he has, why the Action should not be Dismissed for Failure to Return the Requisite Copies of the Complaint for Service. Plaintiff is ORDERED to File a Written Response to this Order to Show Cause within Thirty Days of the Date of this Order. Show Cause Response due by 9/22/2009. (Sant Agata, S)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 On April 3, 2009, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the present 18 action. 19 On May 22, 2009, the Court issued an order finding service of Plaintiff's complaint 20 appropriate for Defendants Fedrick Williams, Haywood Irving, David Wilken, Bernard Finley 21 and the Fresno Police Department. The order contained instructions regarding service of the 22 complaint and explained that in order to serve the Defendants, Plaintiff was required to complete 23 and return five USM-285 forms to the Court, as well five copies of the summons and six copies 24 of the complaint. 25 On June 19, 2009, Plaintiff submitted one copy of the complaint to the Court for service, 26 along with five summonses and five USM-285 forms. Plaintiff also filed a motion requesting 27 that the Court provide all defendants with a copy of the complaint and charge the copies to 28 1 DEON WADE,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) 1:09cv0599 AWI DLB ) ) ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) )
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Plaintiff's inmate trust account at the jail. On June 29, 2009, the Court denied Plaintiff's request that the Court provide copies of the complaint and charge the copies to his jail trust account, explaining that the Court does not have access to his jail trust account and cannot provide copy service for a party. The Court directed the Clerk of the Court to return Plaintiff's copy of the complaint and further ordered Plaintiff to submit six (6) copies of the endorsed complaint within thirty (30) days. More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not submitted the copies. Therefore, Defendants have not yet been served with the complaint. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, if any he has, why the action should not be dismissed for failure to return the requisite copies of the complaint for service. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a written response to this Order to Show Cause within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Failure to respond to this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3b142a
August 19, 2009
/s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?