Wade v. Fresno Police Department et al

Filing 59

ORDER DENYING Motion for Preliminary Injunction, document 50 , and ADOPTING, in full, the Findings and Recommendations dated 10/12/2010, document 51 ; order signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/14/2010. (Rooney, M)

Wade v. Fresno Police Department et al

Doc. 59

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 DEON WADE, 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1
Dockets.Justia.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) 1:09cv0599 AWI DLB ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (Documents 50 & 51)

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the instant action on April 3, 2009. On October 4, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion regarding denial of law library access and mail tampering. Plaintiff requested various forms of equitable relief unrelated to Defendants in this action. On October 12, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that the motion be DENIED because the Court lacks jurisdiction to issue the orders sought. The Findings and Recommendation was served on the parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days. More than thirty (30) days have passed and no objections have been filed. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(c), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendation dated October 12, 2010, are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 December 14, 2010 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2