Dodds v. Lascano et al

Filing 39

ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 30 , 36 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 5/11/11: Plaintiff's Opposition due by 6/13/2011. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 CASE NO. 1:09-CV-00656-AWI-DLB PC 8 JAYMAR DODDS, 9 10 ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS Plaintiff, v. (DOCS. 30, 36) 11 E. LASCANO, et al., 12 RESPONSE DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS Defendants. / 13 14 15 Plaintiff Jaymar Dodds (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California 16 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in 17 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding 18 on Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendants B. Williams, J. Hamlin, and E. Lascano. On 19 November 15, 2010 and April 6, 2011, Defendants filed motions to dismiss. Docs. 30, 36. As 20 of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not file an opposition. Accordingly, it is HEREBY 21 ORDERED that Plaintiff is to file an opposition to Defendants’ motions within thirty (30) days 22 from the date of service of this order. Failure to file a timely opposition will result in waiver of 23 the right to file an opposition and may result in dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court 24 order. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 11, 2011 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?