Dodds v. Lascano et al
Filing
39
ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 30 , 36 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 5/11/11: Plaintiff's Opposition due by 6/13/2011. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
CASE NO. 1:09-CV-00656-AWI-DLB PC
8 JAYMAR DODDS,
9
10
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS TO DISMISS
Plaintiff,
v.
(DOCS. 30, 36)
11 E. LASCANO, et al.,
12
RESPONSE DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS
Defendants.
/
13
14
15
Plaintiff Jaymar Dodds (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California
16 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in
17 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding
18 on Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendants B. Williams, J. Hamlin, and E. Lascano. On
19 November 15, 2010 and April 6, 2011, Defendants filed motions to dismiss. Docs. 30, 36. As
20 of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not file an opposition. Accordingly, it is HEREBY
21 ORDERED that Plaintiff is to file an opposition to Defendants’ motions within thirty (30) days
22 from the date of service of this order. Failure to file a timely opposition will result in waiver of
23 the right to file an opposition and may result in dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court
24 order.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 11, 2011
/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?