Dodds v. Lascano et al

Filing 55

ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to Respond to Defendants' 53 Motion to Compel signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/26/2012. Response due by 11/13/2012.(Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
JAYMAR DODDS,

Case No. 1:09-cv-00656-AWI-DLB PC

9
Plaintiff,
10
v.

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO COMPEL

11
E. LASCANO, et al.,

ECF No. 53

12
Defendants.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
DAYS

Plaintiff Jaymar Dodds (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California Department
of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendants E.
Lascano and J. Hamlin for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. Pending before the Court
is Defendants’ motion to compel, filed September 6, 2012. ECF No. 53. As of the date of this order,
Plaintiff has failed to file a response to the motion.
It is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to respond to Defendants’ motion to compel
within twenty-one days from the date of service of this order. Failure to respond to this order or
Defendants’ motion will result in dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order.

23
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Dennis

October 26, 2012

26

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:

27

L. Beck

3b142a

28
1