Dodds v. Lascano et al

Filing 57

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why This Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Obey a Court Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 11/21/2012. Show Cause Response due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

JAYMAR DODDS,

13
14
15

Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 1:09-cv-00656-AWI-DLB PC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
ECF No. 55

E. LASCANO, et al.,

16

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS

Defendants.

17
18

Plaintiff Jaymar Dodds (“Plaintiff’) is a prisoner in the custody of the California Department

19

of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

20

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 26, 2012, the Court ordered Plaintiff to respond to

21

Defendants’ second motion to compel within twenty-one days. ECF No. 55. Plaintiff had

22

previously failed to respond to Defendants’ first motion to compel, but the Court granted Plaintiff an

23

extension of time to respond. Defendants’ second motion to compel again seeks the responses

24

previously requested in Defendants’ first motion to compel. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has

25

not responded.

26
27
28

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff is to show cause within fourteen (14) days why this action should not be dismissed
for failure to obey a court order; and
1

1

2. If Plaintiff fails to show cause or otherwise timely respond, the Court will dismiss this action

2

for failure to obey a court order.

3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated:

/s/ Dennis

November 21, 2012

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7

DEAC_Signature-END:

8

3b142a

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2