Kunkel v. Dill et al

Filing 189

ORDER Referring Case to Settlement Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 04/10/2013. Confidential Settlement Statements due by 4/29/2013; Settlement Conference set for 5/6/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman.(Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

PATRICK KUNKEL,

11

1:09-cv-00686-BAM PC

Plaintiff,

12

v.

13

N. DILL, et al.,

14

ORDER REFERRING CASE FOR
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
Defendants.

15
16

/
Plaintiff is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in an action brought under 42

17

U.S.C. § 1983. The court has determined that this case would benefit from a settlement

18

conference; therefore, this case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman to

19

conduct a settlement conference on May 6, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. at the U.S. District Court, in

20

Courtroom #25.

21

A separate order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum will issue forthwith.

22

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

23

1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Kendall J.

24

Newman on May 6, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. at the U.S. District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento,

25

California, in Courtroom #25.

26

2. Defendants’ lead counsel and a person with full and unlimited authority to
1

1

negotiate and enter into a binding settlement on defendants’ behalf shall attend in person.1

2

3. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and

3

damages. The failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to this order to appear in

4

person may result in the imposition of sanctions. In addition, the conference will not proceed

5

and will be reset to another date.

6

4. No later than April 29, 2013, the parties are directed to exchange non-

7

confidential settlement statements. These statements shall simultaneously be delivered to the

8

court using the following email address: [e-mail]. Plaintiff shall either mail

9

or deliver his settlement statement to the Clerk’s Office, located on the 4th Floor. If a party

10

desires to share additional confidential information with the court, they may do so pursuant to the

11

provisions of Local Rule 270(d) and (e).

12
13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
10c20k

April 10, 2013

/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

1

The term “full authority to settle” means that the individuals attending the mediation
conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any
settlement terms acceptable to the parties. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp.,
871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989), cited with approval in Official Airline Guides, Inc. v. Goss, 6
F.3d 1385, 1396 (9th Cir. 1993). The individual with full authority to settle must also have
“unfettered discretion and authority” to change the settlement position of the party, if appropriate.
Pittman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003), amended on recon. in
part, Pitman v. Brinker Int’l, Inc., 2003 WL 23353478 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose behind
requiring the attendance of a person with full settlement authority is that the parties’ view of the
case may be altered during the face to face conference. Pitman, 216 F.R.D. at 486. An
authorization to settle for a limited dollar amount or sum certain can be found not to comply with
the requirement of full authority to settle. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 596-97
(8th Cir. 2001).
2