Kunkel v. Dill et al
Filing
196
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/05/13 ordering the undersigned will address the pending motion to cancel the settlement agreement once the court reviews the transcript from the settlement placed on the court record. (Plummer, M)(cc: KJN) Modified on 8/5/2013 (Plummer, M).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PATRICK KUNKEL,
12
No. 1:09-cv-0686 BAM P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
N. DILL, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On June 10, 2013, plaintiff filed a
18
motion to cancel the settlement agreement. Having conducted the settlement agreement, the
19
undersigned should address plaintiff’s motion. The transcript from the May 6, 2013 settlement
20
conference has been ordered. It appears that plaintiff’s primary reason for seeking to set aside the
21
settlement is the delay in receiving payment. Ironically, the payment cannot be processed until
22
plaintiff signs and returns the paperwork forwarded to him by defense counsel. Therefore, any
23
delay seems due to plaintiff’s unwillingness to sign and return the papers. Nevertheless, the
24
undersigned will address the pending motion once the court reviews the transcript from the
25
settlement placed on the court record.
26
Dated: August 5, 2013
27
28
kunk0686.ord
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?