Kunkel v. Dill et al
Filing
198
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/23/13 ORDERING that Plaintiff is directed to file, within 21 days, a statement as to whether he still wishes to contest the settlement and, if so, on what grounds; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the May 6, 2013 settlement transcript (ECF No. 197 ).(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PATRICK KUNKEL,
12
No. 1:09-cv-0686 BAM P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
N. DILL, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. The court has now received the
transcript of the settlement agreement placed on the record on May 6, 2013 (ECF No. 197).
In plaintiff’s June 10, 2013 motion to cancel the settlement agreement, plaintiff’s primary
20
reason for seeking to set aside the settlement was the delay in receiving the payment.
21
On July 15, 2013, plaintiff filed a second motion seeking a ruling on the settlement, in which
22
plaintiff claims that his understanding of the settlement agreement was that the agreed payment
23
was to be in addition to the payment of plaintiff’s restitution balance.
24
However, the court has reviewed the transcript of the settlement agreement, which makes
25
clear that the agreed settlement was the total amount to be paid (Tr. at 2:1-2), and that the funds
26
would first be applied to plaintiff’s outstanding restitution balance, and the rest would be paid to
27
plaintiff’s inmate trust account (Tr. at 3:4-7). Moreover, the undersigned expressly informed the
28
parties, on the record, that payment could take up to six months, but hopefully would be
1
1
something less than six months. (Tr. at 2:13-16.) The court informed defense counsel that the
2
court wanted payment and the filing of dispositional document to happen sooner than six months
3
if humanly possible. (Tr. at 6:25-7:1-3.) Ironically, plaintiff’s payment cannot be processed until
4
he signs and returns the paperwork forwarded to him by defense counsel. Therefore, any delay in
5
the receipt of payment is due solely to plaintiff’s own making. Finally, the parties were informed
6
that a party could not refuse to sign the agreement based solely on a change of heart as to the
7
settlement amount following the settlement agreement. (Tr. at 5:3-13.)
8
9
Therefore, plaintiff is directed to file, within 21 days, a statement as to whether he still
wishes to contest the settlement and, if so, on what grounds. In the alternative, plaintiff may
10
simply sign the paperwork provided by defense counsel so that efforts can be made to expedite
11
payment of the settlement amount pursuant to the court’s record.
12
In light of the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
13
1. Plaintiff is directed to file, within 21 days, a statement as to whether he still wishes to
14
15
contest the settlement and, if so, on what grounds; and
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the May 6, 2013
16
17
settlement transcript (ECF No. 197).
Dated: August 23, 2013
18
19
20
21
kunk0686.set2
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?