Soto, et al. v. Castlerock Farming, et al.

Filing 81

ORDER Amending Scheduling Order signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/21/2011. Pretrial Conference and Trial dates are VACATED. ALL OTHER DEADLINES set forth in the scheduling order are STAYED. Telephonic Status Conference set for 11/29/2011 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston, joint statement filing deadline 11/22/2011. (Leon-Guerrero, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SILVESTRE SOTO and OLGA GALVAN, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated individuals, ) Case No.: 1:09-cv-00701 AWI JLT ) ) ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) CASTLEROCK FARMING AND ) TRANSPORT, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________ ) After beginning in state court, this action was removed to the Eastern District on December 19 21, 2005. This putative class action case seeks damages and other relief against for alleged 20 violations of the Agricultural Workers Protection Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1801, et seq; failure to pay wages; 21 failure to pay reporting time wages; failure to provide rest and meal periods; failure to pay wages of 22 terminated or resigned employees; knowing and intentional failure to comply with itemized 23 employee wage statement provisions; penalties under Labor Code § 2699, et seq; breach of contract; 24 and violation of unfair competition law. 25 On February 23, 2011, Plaintiffs filed their notice of motion to compel documents related to 26 class certification issues. (Doc. 25) Soon thereafter, on February 28, 2011, the Court held a 27 telephonic conference with counsel and ordered the discovery dispute to proceed with traditional 28 briefing, rather than the abbreviated joint statement method typically required. (Doc. 28) As a 1 1 consequence of this expanded briefing schedule, the Court stayed the deadlines related to class 2 discovery, expert disclosure, expert discovery and the deadline by which the motion for class 3 certification would be filed until the dispute could be resolved. Id. On March 24, 2011, the Court 4 granted Defendant’s request to be permitted to depose certain declarants who provided evidence in 5 support of the motion to compel. (Doc. 35) On May 23, 2011, Plaintiffs filed their motion to compel 6 and third-party, J. L. Padilla & Sons, filed a motion to quash the subpoena duces tecum issued by 7 Plaintiffs. (Doc. 37-39) On June 6, 2011, Defendant filed its opposition to the motion to compel 8 (Doc. 40) and Plaintiff filed its opposition to the motion to quash. (Doc. 43) Reply papers were filed 9 by Plaintiff and Defendant on June 13 and June 20, 2011, respectively. (Docs. 46, 48) 10 The Court heard argument on the matters on June 23, 2011 (Doc. 53) and issued its written 11 order granting the motion to compel in part and denying the motion to quash on July 8, 2011. (Doc. 12 61) On July 20, 2011, Defendant and J.L. Padilla & Sons filed a motion for reconsideration of the 13 Magistrate Judge’s order with the District Judge. (Doc. 62) Because the motion for reconsideration 14 has not yet been determined, the stay of the discovery deadlines issued on February 23, 2011, 15 remains in effect. 16 17 Given this procedural posture, the dates selected at the scheduling conference are no longer workable. As a result, the Court hereby amends the scheduling order. 18 ORDER 19 1. The pretrial conference and trial dates are VACATED; 20 2. All other deadlines set forth in the scheduling order are STAYED; 21 3. A telephonic status conference is ORDERED to be held on November 29, 2011 at 9 22 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. No later than November 22, 2011, 23 counsel SHALL file a joint statement setting forth the status of discovery and 24 proposed dates for the deadlines stayed/vacated in this order. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: September 21, 2011 9j7khi /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?