[GSA] Munoz et al v. Giumarra Vineyards Corporation
Filing
173
ORDER AFTER FURTHER STATUS CONFERENCE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/23/2015. Reply Brief due no later than 4/13/2015. Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment set for 6/15/2015 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
) Case No.: 1:09-cv-00703-AWI-JLT
)
Plaintiffs,
) ORDER AFTER FURTHER STATUS
) CONFERENCE
v.
)
GIUMMARA VINEYARDS CORPORATION, )
)
)
Defendant.
)
RAPHAEL MUNOZ, et al.,
16
17
On March 23, 2015, the Court held a further status conference. At the conference, counsel
18
reported that revised analysis of the data has revealed that Plaintiff’s contend there were fewer
19
violations that previously thought and fewer than previously outlined in Plaintiff’s motion for
20
summary judgment. Counsel reported also that the objections to the evidence submitted by Plaintiffs
21
in support of the motion have not been resolved.
22
Thus, based upon its conference with counsel, the Court ORDERS:
23
1.
No later than April 13, 2015, Plaintiffs may file their reply to Defendant’s opposition
24
to their motion for summary judgment. The parties agree the reply may revise the numbers of
25
violations claimed by Plaintiffs to have occurred and the revisions;
26
2.
If the reply revises the numbers of violations claimed, Defendants may file a surreply
27
that addresses only the revisions no later than May 4, 2015. The surreply may not be used to counter
28
arguments made by Plaintiffs that are unrelated to the new material included in the reply;
1
1
2
3.
A hearing on the motion for summary judgment is set on June 15, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. in
courtroom 2, before the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 23, 2015
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?