[GSA] Munoz et al v. Giumarra Vineyards Corporation

Filing 194

ORDER Extending Time to File Opposition and Reply for Defendant's Motion to De-Certify the Late Meal Period Class, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/12/2016. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAFAEL MUNOZ, LIDIA CRUZ, YANET 7 HERNANDEZ, SANTOS R. VALENZUELA, TRINIDAD RUIZ, 8 MARTA A. RINCON de DIAZ, RAMON CERVANTES PERALES and HUGO 9 PEREZ RIOS on behalf of themselves, and all current and former employees, and on 10 behalf of a class of similarly situated 11 employees 12 Case No.: 1:09-cv-00703-AWI-JLT ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DECERTIFY THE LATE MEAL PERIOD CLASS Plaintiffs, vs. 13 14 GIUMARRA VINEYARDS CORPORATION; and DOES 1-20, 15 Defendant. 16 The parties have stipulated to a two-week extension of time to file the opposition and 17 18 replies to Defendant’s motion to decertify the late meal period class. The extension will allow 19 the parties to prepare for and engage in mediation. For that reason, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 20 THAT: 21 22 23 24 1. Plaintiffs’ opposition brief to Defendant’s motion to decertify the late meal period class and any evidentiary objections shall be extended to February 26, 2016. 2. Defendant’s reply brief in support of its motion to decertify the late meal period class and any evidentiary objections shall be due on March 18, 2016. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: February 12, 2016 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?