[SMS] Rojas et al v. Marko Zaninovich, Inc. et al
Filing
272
ORDER DISCHARGING 270 the Order to Show Cause Dated March 10, 2015; ORDER GRANTING Final Approval of the Class Notice Packet, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/13/2015. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SANTIAGO ROJAS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
15
16
v.
MARKO ZANINOVICH, INC. and
SUNVIEW VINEYARDS OF
CALIFORNIA, INC.,
Defendants.
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:09-cv-00705-AWI-JLT
ORDER DISCHARGING THE ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE DATED MARCH 10, 2015 (Doc. 270)
ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF THE
CLASS NOTICE PACKET
The Court granted preliminary approval of the class settlement in this action, and approved the
19
class notice plan proposed by the parties. However, the parties failed to file a revised Class Notice
20
Packet. Therefore, on March 10, 2015, the Court ordered the parties to show cause why sanctions
21
should not be imposed, or in the alternative, file the Class Notice Packet for approval. (Doc. 270.)
22
Plaintiffs filed a timely response on March 12, 2015. (Doc. 271.) Accordingly, the Order to Show
23
Cause is DISCHARGED.
24
The revised Class Notice Packet—including the Class Notice, Benefit Form, and Exclusion
25
Request Form—contains the information required by Rule 23(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil
26
Procedure, including the nature of the action, the class definition approved by the Court, the claims and
27
issues to be resolved, how a class member may chose to be excluded from the class, the time and
28
method to opt-out of the class, the deadlines applicable to the Class Members, and the binding effect of
1
1
a class judgment. Therefore, final approval of the Class Notice Packet is GRANTED.
2
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 13, 2015
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?