Rosales et al v. El Rancho Farms

Filing 177

ORDER GRANTING 176 Plaintiffs' Request for Approval of the Amended Class Notice, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/8/2014. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARGARITA ROSALES, et al., Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 v. EL RANCHO FARMS, et al., 15 16 Defendants. ANGEL LOPEZ CRUZ, et al., 17 Plaintiffs, 18 v. 19 EL RANCHO FARMS, et al., 20 Defendants. 21 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:09-cv-00707- AWI-JLT ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED CLASS NOTICE (Doc. 176) 22 On December 5, 2014, Plaintiffs Margarita Rosales and Angelica Rosales1 submitted an 23 amended Class Notice for the Court’s approval. (Doc. 176.) Plaintiffs have complied with the Court’s 24 orders regarding its contents, and the Class Notice contains the information required by Rule 23(c) of 25 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including the nature of the action, the class definition approved by 26 27 28 1 The true and correct name of “Angelica Rosales” is “Maria Lorena Corza Alvarado,” though she is known as “Lorena Corza.” Ms. Corza reports she used the name of her daughter, “Angelica Rosales,” while working at El Rancho. (Doc. 35-7 at 3). Therefore, the Court will refer to plaintiff “Angelica Rosales” as “Lorena Corza.” 1 1 the Court, the claims and issues to be resolved, how a class member may enter the action and appear 2 through an attorney or chose to be excluded from the class, the time and method to opt-out of the class, 3 and the binding effect of a class judgment. For these reasons, final approval of the Class Notice (Doc. 4 176) is GRANTED. 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 8, 2014 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?