Rosales et al v. El Rancho Farms
Filing
181
ORDER APPROVING 180 THE AMENDED CLASS NOTICE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/29/2015. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARGARITA ROSALES, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
v.
EL RANCHO FARMS, et al.,
15
16
Defendants.
ANGEL LOPEZ CRUZ, et al.,
17
Plaintiffs,
18
v.
19
EL RANCHO FARMS, et al.,
20
Defendants.
21
22
) Case No.: 1:09-cv-00707- AWI-JLT
)
) ORDER APPROVING THE AMENDED CLASS
) NOTICE (Doc. 180)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
On January 13, 2015, the Court continued the deadlines related to the class notice based upon
23
the stipulation of the parties. (Docs. 178-179.) On January 26, 2014, Plaintiffs Margarita Rosales and
24
Angelica Rosales1 submitted an amended Class Notice for the Court’s approval, with the revised
25
deadlines. (Doc. 180.)
26
27
28
1
The true and correct name of “Angelica Rosales” is “Maria Lorena Corza Alvarado,” though she is known as
“Lorena Corza.” Ms. Corza reports she used the name of her daughter, “Angelica Rosales,” while working at El Rancho.
(Doc. 35-7 at 3). Therefore, the Court will refer to plaintiff “Angelica Rosales” as “Lorena Corza.”
1
1
Plaintiffs have complied with the Court’s orders regarding its contents, and the Class Notice
2
contains the information required by Rule 23(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including the
3
nature of the action, the class definition approved by the Court, the claims and issues to be resolved,
4
how a class member may enter appear through an attorney or chose to be excluded from the class, the
5
time and method to opt-out of the class, and the binding effect of a class judgment. For these reasons,
6
the amended Class Notice (Doc. 180) is APPROVED.
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 29, 2015
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?