Allen v. Meyer et al

Filing 75

ORDER DISREGARDING 73 Order Requiring Clarification from Plaintiff's Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 1/28/2015. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

KELVIN ALLEN,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12

v.
MEYER, et al.,

13

Case No. 1:09-cv-00729 DLB PC
ORDER DISREGARDING ORDER
REQUIRING CLARIFICATION FROM
PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL
(Document 73)

Defendants.

14
15

Plaintiff Kelvin Allen (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis

16

in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 20, 2014, the Ninth Circuit Court of

17

Appeals remanded the action to this Court with instructions to vacate the judgment.
Pursuant to the July 23, 2014, Notice of Appearance, Plaintiff is represented by counsel for

18
19

the limited purpose of resolving the issue of exhaustion of administrative remedies.
On January 27, 2015, the Court issued an order to Plaintiff’s counsel requesting clarification

20
21

of Plaintiff’s January 22, 2015, request for judicial notice. However, Plaintiff’s January 27, 2015,

22

motion for the appointment of counsel includes many of the same exhibits and provided clarification

23

of Plaintiff’s purpose.

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28
1

1

Accordingly, the January 27, 2015, order (Document 73) is DISREGARDED.

2
3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Dennis

January 28, 2015

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2