Allen v. Meyer et al
Filing
77
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion For Appointment Of Counsel Without Prejudice(Document 74 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 1/30/2015. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
KELVIN ALLEN,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
v.
Case No. 1:09-cv-00729 LJO DLB PC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
MEYER, et al.,
(Document 74)
13
Defendants.
14
15
Plaintiff Kelvin Allen (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis
16
in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 20, 2014, the Ninth Circuit Court of
17
Appeals remanded the action to this Court with instructions to vacate the judgment.
Pursuant to the July 23, 2014, Notice of Appearance, Plaintiff is represented by counsel for
18
19
the limited purpose of resolving the issue of exhaustion of administrative remedies.
20
On January 27, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for the appointment of counsel to represent him
21
on issues other than exhaustion. At this point in the proceedings, however, only the exhaustion issue
22
is before the Court. In other words, the Court has not yet moved on to the merits of Plaintiff’s
23
claims.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If the action
1
2
survives the exhaustion challenge, Plaintiff may file a motion for the appointment of counsel at that
3
time.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
January 30, 2015
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?