McDonald v. Yates et al

Filing 12

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why case should not be dismissed, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 8/5/2010. Show Cause Response due by 8/24/2010. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
(PC) McDonald v. Yates et al Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JIMMY MCDONALD, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00730-OWW-SMS PC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED (Doc. ) J. A. YATES, et al., FIFTEEN-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. / Plaintiff Jimmy McDonald, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on April 24, 2009. On October 14, 2009, the Court issued a screening order requiring Plaintiff to either file an amended complaint or notify the Court of his willingness to proceed only on the claims found to be cognizable in the screening order, within thirty days. On January 6, 2010, the Court granted Plaintiff a second thirty-day extension of time. More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the order. Accordingly, Plaintiff has fifteen (15) days within which to show cause why this action should not be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to obey a court order. The failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: icido3 August 5, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?