Huckabee v. Medical Staff at CSATF et al
Filing
229
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Motion Seeking Leave to Amend Within Thirty Days or Proposed Sixth Amended Complaint will be Stricken, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/15/17. Thirty-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTHONY CRAIG HUCKABEE,
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
MEDICAL STAFF AT CSATF, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 1:09-cv-00749-DAD-BAM (PC)
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
MOTION SEEKING LEAVE TO AMEND
WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OR PROPOSED
SIXTH AMENDED COMPLAINT WILL BE
STRICKEN
(ECF No. 228)
THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE
17
18
Plaintiff Anthony Craig Huckabee (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in
19
forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on
20
Plaintiff’s fifth amended complaint against Defendants Wu, McGuinness, Enenmoh, Jeffreys, and
21
Jimenez in their individual capacities for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in
22
violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF Nos. 195, 199.)
23
On September 11, 2017, Plaintiff submitted a proposed sixth amended complaint, but it
24
was not accompanied by a motion seeking leave to amend. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b), 16(b)(4).
25
Plaintiff is required to file a motion supported by good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4); Zivkovic
26
v. S. Cal. Edison Co., 302 F.3d 1080, 1087 (9th Cir. 2002).
27
28
Accordingly, Plaintiff shall file a motion seeking leave to file an amended complaint
within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order. If he fails to do so, his proposed
1
1
sixth amended complaint, lodged on September 11, 2107, will be stricken from the record.
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
September 15, 2017
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?