Stamas, et al vs. County of Madera, et al.

Filing 45

STIPULATION re Time to File First Amended Complaint; ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 8/24/09. The time for Plaintiffs, Mark Stamas and Judy Castles, to file their First Amended Complaint to be continued 30 days, to and including September 21, 2009. The Answer to the First Amended Complaint will be due 30 days after the filing of the First Amended Complaint, to and including October 21, 2009.(Verduzco, M)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
G R I S W O L D , LaSALLE, C O BB, D O W D & G I N , LLP
111 E. SEVENTH STREET HANFORD, CA 93230

ROBERT M. DOWD, #070685 RAYMOND L. CARLSON, #138043 STEVEN S. DIAS, #251138 GRISWOLD, LaSALLE, COBB, DOWD & GIN, L.L.P. 111 E. Seventh Street Hanford, CA 93230 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for: Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK STAMAS and JUDY CASTLES,

) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) COUNTY OF MADERA; BOARD OF ) SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ) MADERA; DAVID HERMAN, an individual; ) SHAWN HUSTON, an individual; ) DAVID PRENTICE, an individual; GERALD ) HOUSTON and LINDA BARLOW, husband ) and wife; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) )

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00753-LJO-SMS STIPULATION RE TIME TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER

Plaintiffs, MARK STAMAS and JUDY CASTLES ("PLAINTIFFS") and Defendants, COUNTY OF MADERA; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF MADERA; DAVID HERMAN, SHAWN HUSTON, and DAVID PRENTICE "(DEFENDANTS"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate to extend the due date of the PLAINTIFFS' First Amended Complaint. \\\ \\\ \\\ 1.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Mark Stamas, et al. v. County of Madera, et al. Case No. 1:09-cv-00753-LJO-SMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

This Stipulation is made on the ground that good cause for the extension exists based upon the following facts and circumstances: 1. 2. 3. Complexity of the issues; Complexity of amending the complaint; and Conflicts on the calendar of Plaintiffs' attorneys.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for PLAINTIFFS and DEFENDANTS, as follows: 1. Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint is continued 30 days, to and including September 21, 2009. 2. Defendants' Answer to the First Amended Complaint will be due 30 days after the filing of the First Amended Complaint, to and including October 21, 2009.

Dated: August 20, 2009

GRISWOLD, LaSALLE, COBB, DOWD & GIN, L.L.P.

By: 16 17 Dated: August 20, 2009 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
G R I S W O L D , LaSALLE, C O BB, D O W D & G I N , LLP
111 E. SEVENTH STREET HANFORD, CA 93230

/s/ Robert M. Dowd ROBERT M. DOWD Attorneys for Plaintiffs

EMERSON, COREY, SORENSEN, CHURCH, & YOHMAN

By:

/s/Andrew W. Sorensen ANDREW W. SORENSEN Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF MADERA, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF MADERA, DAVID HERMAN, SHAWN HUSTON and DAVID PRENTICE

\\\ \\\ \\\ 2.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Mark Stamas, et al. v. County of Madera, et al. Case No. 1:09-cv-00753-LJO-SMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: icido3 August 24, 2009

ORDER On the stipulation and agreement of the parties through their attorneys of record and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS SO ORDERED that the time for Plaintiffs, MARK STAMAS and JUDY CASTLES, to file their First Amended Complaint to be continued 30 days, to and including September 21, 2009. The Answer to the First Amended Complaint will be due 30 days after the filing of the First Amended Complaint, to and including October 21, 2009.

/s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

3.
G R I S W O L D , LaSALLE, C O BB, D O W D & G I N , LLP
111 E. SEVENTH STREET HANFORD, CA 93230

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Mark Stamas, et al. v. County of Madera, et al. Case No. 1:09-cv-00753-LJO-SMS