Allen v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 31

ORDER Amending Scheduling Order Regarding Discovery of Doe Defendants signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/6/2010. (Esteves, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6i0kij On December 23, 2009, the Court dismissed the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation as a defendant in this action and referred the matter back to the Magistrate Judge to open discovery for the limited purpose of identifying Defendant Does 1 through 10. In accordance with the Court's order, discovery for the purpose of identifying Defendant Does 1 through 10 shall be completed no later than March 31, 2010. Any Amended Complaint naming the Doe Defendants shall be filed no later than April 30, 2010. All other dates and orders set forth in the scheduling order issued on October 5, 2009 (Doc. 18) remain in full force and effect. Failure to file an Amended Complaint may result in dismissal of this action. v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. JUANITA ALLEN, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00767-AWI-GSA ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY OF DOE DEFENDANTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT January 6, 2010 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?