Tate v. Cate et al

Filing 35

ORDER GRANTING Defendant's Request for Deposition 34 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/23/11: Defendant may take the deposition of Plaintiff in regard to this action while he is incarcerated in prison. (Hellings, J)

(PC) Tate v. Cate et al

Doc. 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. (Doc. 34) MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants. _________________________________/ On March 22, 2011, Defendant sought leave, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(B), to take the deposition of Plaintiff. In addition, Defendant requested that the deposition be taken by video conferencing, if feasible. Good cause appearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant may take the deposition of Plaintiff in regard to this action while he is incarcerated in prison. Further, the deposition may be taken by video conferencing. However, nothing in this order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which Plaintiff is housed to obtain video conferencing equipment if it is not already available. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 23, 2011 9j7khi /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE LARRY TATE, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:09-cv-00770 JLT (PC) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR DEPOSITION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Dockets.Justia.com