Harris v. Rios et al
Filing
102
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 96 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/7/13: Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 95 is STRICKEN from the record. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
DONTE ROLANDO HARRIS,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
v.
H. A. RIOS, et al.,
Case No. 1:09-cv-00781-MJS (PC)
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(ECF No. 96)
Defendants.
14
15
16
Plaintiff Donte Rolando Harris, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this
17
civil rights action on April 27, 2009 pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
18
of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
19
Before the Court is Defendants’ October 21, 2013 motion to strike (ECF No. 96)
20
Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment filed (ECF No. 95.) Defendants argue Plaintiff’s
21
summary judgment motion is untimely because it was filed after the September 9, 2013
22
deadline for filing dispositive motions. Plaintiff has filed a statement of non-opposition to
23
Defendants’ motion. (ECF No. 101.)
24
Defendants’ unopposed motion to strike shall be granted. Plaintiff’s summary
25
judgment motion was filed after the September 9, 2013 deadline for dispositive motions
26
(see ECF No. 70) and without the Court’s authorization. It is stricken on that basis. Local
27
Rule 110.
28
Accordingly, for the reasons stated, Defendants’ motion to strike (ECF No. 96) is
1
1
GRANTED and Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 95) is hereby STRIKEN
2
from the record.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
Dated:
11
December 7, 2013
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC _Signature- END:
12
Michael J. Seng
12eob4
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?