Brown v. Williams et al

Filing 65

AMENDED SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 7/18/2012. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

THORNELL BROWN,

10

Plaintiff,

11

vs.

12

R. J. WILLIAMS, et al.,

13

AMENDED SECOND INFORMATIONAL
ORDER - NOTICE AND WARNING OF
REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING
DEFENDANTS’ SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION

Defendants.

14

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00792-LJO-GBC (PC)

________________________________/

15
16

Plaintiff Thornell Brown (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis (“IFP”)

17

in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s

18

complaint, filed May 4, 2009, against Defendants Williams and Gonzales (“Defendants”) for use of

19

excessive force and subjecting Plaintiff to unconstitutional conditions of confinement following the

20

use of force on May 23, 2005, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Doc. 1 (Complaint); Doc. 8

21

(Cog. Claim Ord.).

22

Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on March 29, 2012, and pursuant to Woods

23

v. Carey, Nos. 09-15548, 09-16113, 2012 WL 2626912 (9th Cir. Jul. 6, 2012), Rand v. Rowland, 154

24

F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), the Court hereby

25

notifies Plaintiff of the following rights and requirements for opposing the motion:

26
27
28

1. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions for summary judgment are briefed pursuant to Local
Rule 230(l).
2. Plaintiff is required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants’
1

1

motion for summary judgment. Local Rule 230(l). If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition or a

2

statement of non-opposition to the motion, this action may be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure

3

to prosecute. The opposition or statement of non-opposition must be filed not more than 21 days

4

after the date of service of the motion. Id.

5

3. A motion for summary judgment is a request for judgment on some or all of Plaintiff’s

6

claims in favor of Defendants without trial. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). Defendants’ motion sets forth the

7

facts which they contend are not reasonably subject to dispute and that entitle them to judgment as

8

a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). This is called the Statement of Undisputed Facts. Local Rule

9

260(a).

10

Plaintiff has the right to oppose a motion for summary judgment. To oppose the motion,

11

Plaintiff must show proof of his claims. Plaintiff may agree with the facts set forth in Defendants’

12

motion but argue that Defendants are not entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

13

In the alternative, if Plaintiff does not agree with the facts set forth in Defendants’ motion,

14

he may show that Defendants’ facts are disputed in one or more of the following ways: (1) Plaintiff

15

may rely upon statements made under the penalty of perjury in the complaint or the opposition if (a)

16

the complaint or opposition shows that Plaintiff has personal knowledge of the matters stated and

17

(b) Plaintiff calls to the Court’s attention those parts of the complaint or opposition upon which

18

Plaintiff relies; (2) Plaintiff may serve and file declarations setting forth the facts which Plaintiff

19

believes prove his claims;1 (3) Plaintiff may rely upon written records but Plaintiff must prove that

20

the records are what he claims they are;2 or (4) Plaintiff may rely upon all or any part of the transcript

21

of one or more depositions, answers to interrogatories, or admissions obtained in this proceeding.

22

Should Plaintiff fail to contradict Defendants’ motion with declarations or other evidence,

23
24
25
26
27
28

1

A declaration is a written statement setting forth facts (1) which are admissible in evidence, (2) which are
based on the personal knowledge of the person giving the statement, and (3) to which the person giving the statement
is competent to testify. 28 U.S.C. § 1746; Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(4). A declaration must be dated and signed under
penalty of perjury as follows: “I declare (or certify, verify or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature).” 28 U.S.C. § 1746.
2

Sworn or certified copies of all papers referred to in the declaration must be included and served on the
opposing party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e).

2

1

Defendants’ evidence will be taken as truth, and final judgment may be entered without a full trial.

2

Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e).

3

In opposing Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, Local Rule 260(b) requires Plaintiff

4

to reproduce Defendants’ itemized facts in the Statement of Undisputed Facts and admit those facts

5

which are undisputed and deny those which are disputed. If Plaintiff disputes (denies) a fact,

6

Plaintiff must cite to the evidence used to support that denial (e.g., pleading, declaration, deposition,

7

interrogatory answer, admission, or other document). Local Rule 260(b).

8

4. If discovery has not yet been opened or if discovery is still open and Plaintiff is not yet

9

able to present facts to justify the opposition to the motion, the Court will consider a request to

10

postpone consideration of Defendants’ motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d). Any request to postpone

11

consideration of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment must include the following: (1) a

12

declaration setting forth the specific facts Plaintiff hopes to elicit from further discovery, (2) a

13

showing that the facts exist, and (3) a showing that the facts are essential to opposing the motion for

14

summary judgment. Blough v. Holland Realty, Inc., 574 F.3d 1084, 1091 n.5 (9th Cir. 2009); Tatum

15

v. City and County of San Francisco, 441 F.3d 1090, 1100-01 (9th Cir. 2006); State of California

16

v. Campbell, 138 F.3d 772, 779 (9th Cir. 1998). The request to postpone the motion for summary

17

judgment must identify what information is sought and how it would preclude summary judgment.

18

Blough, 574 F.3d at 1091 n.5; Tatum, 441 F.3d at 1100-01; Margolis v. Ryan, 140 F.3d 850, 853 (9th

19

Cir. 1998); Local Rule 260(b).

20
21

5. Unsigned declarations will be stricken, and declarations not signed under penalty of
perjury have no evidentiary value.

22

6. The failure of any party to comply with this order, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

23

or the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California may result in the imposition of sanctions

24

including but not limited to dismissal of the action or entry of default.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated:
0jh02o

July 18, 2012
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
3