Sipe v. Countrywide Bank, et al.

Filing 60

ORDER After Scheduling Conference; Scheduling Conference set for 11/18/2010 at 08:15 AM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 9/17/2010. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
Sipe v. Countrywide Bank, et al. Doc. 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A Scheduling Conference was held in this case on September 17, 2010. Plaintiff appeared by and through his attorney There was no appearance for any v. COUNTRYWQIDE BANK; SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC.; BANK OF MADERA COUNTY; COUNTRYWIDE DOCUMENT CUSTODY SERVICES, A DIVISION OF TREASURY BANK, N.A.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC.; FINANCIAL ADVANTAGE, INC.; JOHN NORBERG, CAROL DESILVA; AND DOES 1-20, INCLUSIVE, VINCENT SIPE, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:09-cv-0798 OWW JLT ORDER AFTER SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Further Scheduling Conference Date: 11/18/10 8:15 Ctrm. 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Jonathan G. Stein, Esq. Defendant. The Court has ruled on pending motions to dismiss. To the extent that parties Defendant remain in the case, they failed to participate in or appear at the Scheduling Conference. A continuance of the conference for sixty (60) days shall be 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 granted and following that period of time, it is expected that all parties who have not been dismissed from the case, shall file responsive pleadings and a Joint Scheduling Conference Report in accordance with the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California. Any party failing to do so may be subject to sanctions. A Further Scheduling Conference will be held November 18, 2010, at 8:15 a.m. in Courtroom 3. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 17, 2010 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?