Sipe v. Countrywide Bank, et al.

Filing 96

ORDER GRANTING in Part Request for Additional Time to Submit Evidence in Support of Default Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/11/2012. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VINCENT SIPE, 12 13 14 15 16 17 Case No. 1:09-cv-00798 JLT Plaintiff, GRANTING IN PART REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT v. COUNTRY WIDE BANK, et al., Defendants. _____________________________________ On January 10, 2012, Plaintiff filed his motion for default judgment but failed to set it for 18 hearing. (Docs. 83, 87) On April 16, 2012, the Court set the matter for hearing and heard it on 19 May 24, 2012. (Doc. 94) At the hearing, the Court expressed concern that the measure of 20 damages was not the entire value of the alleged wrongful loan as Plaintiff claimed. Thus, the 21 Court expressed that the motion failed to set forth the lawful measure of damages. Counsel 22 agreed with the Court’s analysis and requested additional time to provide evidence, in the form of 23 an expert declaration, which would set forth Plaintiff’s lawful damages. Thus, Plaintiff’s 24 additional evidence was due on July 6, 2012. (Doc. 94) 25 Now before the Court is the declaration of counsel seeking 90 days additional to submit 26 the evidence. (Doc. 95) Counsel reports that he has met with various experts but has not yet been 27 able to obtain the needed declarations. Id. 28 Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the 1 1 request for the extension of time. Plaintiff is granted 60 days from the date of this order to file the 2 needed declarations. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6 July 11, 2012 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 DEAC_Signature-END: 9j7khijed 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?