Holt v. Nicholas et al

Filing 122

ORDER SETTING New Dispositive Deadline of April 30, 2014 to File Further Response to Second Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/24/14. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

VIRGIL E. HOLT,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
R. NICHOLAS, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

Case No.: 1:09-cv-00800-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER SETTING NEW DISPOSITIVE
DEADLINE OF APRIL 30, 2014 TO FILE
FURTHER RESPONSE TO SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Virgil E. Holt is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On September 27, 2013, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was denied without

19
20

prejudice to re-filing in accordance with a new dispositive motions deadline, following resolution of

21

any potential motions to compel. The matter was referred back to the undersigned “for the purpose of

22

ruling on Plaintiff’s motion to compel, setting a new dispositive motions deadline, and possibly setting

23

a new discovery deadline.” (ECF NO. 115, at 3:12-14.)
Subsequent to the September 27, 2013, order, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel on October 28,

24
25

2013, and Defendants filed an opposition on November 18, 2013. (ECF Nos. 118, 120.)

26

On January 22, 2014, the undersigned denied in part and granted in Plaintiff’s motion to

27

compel. Any response to the motion was ordered due within thirty days from the date of service of the

28

order.
1

1
2

Because any discovery issues have now been resolved, the Court hereby directs Defendants to
file a further response to the second amended complaint on or before April 30, 2014.

3
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

March 24, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2