Holt v. Nicholas et al
Filing
151
AMENDMENT TO SECOND SCHEDULING ORDER as to 149 and 150 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 08/19/2015. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
VIRGIL E. HOLT,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
R. NICHOLAS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Case No.: 1:09-cv-00800-AWI-SAB (PC)
AMENDMENT TO SECOND
SCHEDULING ORDER
[ECF Nos. 149, 150]
Plaintiff Virgil E. Holt is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
19
On July 30, 2015, the Court issued a second scheduling order. (ECF No. 149.)
20
On August 17, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for clarification of the second scheduling order.
21
(ECF No. 150.) Plaintiff correctly points out that the second scheduling order inadvertently omitted
22
the fact that the action is proceeding against Defendant Nicholas, Holguin, Ortega, Machado, and
23
Juden on Plaintiff’s claim of deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in addition to the
24
excessive force and failure to intervene.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
Accordingly, the second scheduling order is amended to reflect that this action proceeds
1
2
against Defendants Nicholas, Holguin, Ortega, Machado, and Juden for excessive force, failure to
3
intervene and deliberate indifference to a serious medical need, and against Defendant Velasco for
4
deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated:
8
August 19, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?