Holt v. Nicholas et al

Filing 190

SECOND ORDER Directing Defendants to Submit Dispositional Documents Within Twenty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/23/16. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VIRGIL E. HOLT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. R. NICHOLAS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Case No.: 1:09-cv-00800-SAB (PC) SECOND ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO SUBMIT DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS WITHIN TWENTY DAYS [ECF Nos. 181, 186] Plaintiff Virgil E. Holt is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. On November 30, 2015, Magistrate Judge Seng held a settlement conference and the parties 19 20 reached a settlement resolving this action. Accordingly, all trial dates were vacated on that same date. 21 On January 11, 2016, the Court directed the parties to file dispositional documents within thirty days. 22 (ECF No. 186.) 23 The thirty day time frame has expired, and dispositional documents have not been filed. 24 Indeed, on February 11, 2016, Plaintiff filed a declaration indicating that dispositional documents have 25 not be filed or submitted to him for review. (ECF No. 186.) 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 It is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file dispositional documents within twenty 1 2 (20) days from the date of service of this order. Local Rule 160. Failure to comply with this order 3 may result in the imposition of sanctions pursuant to Local Rules 160 and 272. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: 7 February 23, 2016 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?