Shepard v. Quillen

Filing 107

ORDER Disregarding Plaintiff's Opposition To Defendant Quillen's Disclosure Of Expert Witness Information (ECF No. 101 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/22/2013. (Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

LAMONT SHEPARD,

10
11
12

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00809-LJO-BAM (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT QUILLEN’S
DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS
INFORMATION

v.
T. QUILLEN, et al.,

(ECF No. 101)
13

Defendants.
/

14
15

Plaintiff Lamont Shepard (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

16

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. A telephonic trial confirmation

17

hearing in this action is set for February 7, 2013, at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Lawrence J.

18

O’Neill. On January 9, 2013, Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendant Quillen calling retained

19

witness, Harold Jackson, M.D., as an expert at the time of trial. (ECF No. 101.)

20

Plaintiff’s purported opposition is a motion in limine and is premature. After considering

21

the parties’ pretrial statements, the Court will issue a pretrial order establishing the deadlines to

22

file motions in limine and oppositions to the motions in limine. Plaintiff may file any motion in

23

limine after the Court sets the relevant deadlines for such motions. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s

24

opposition is HEREBY DISREGARDED as a premature motion in limine.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
10c20k

January 22, 2013

/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1