Shepard v. Quillen

Filing 12

ORDER DENYING 11 Request for Entry of Default filed by Lamont Shepard, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 02/02/2010. (Martin, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Lamont Shepard ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendant T. Quillen for violation of the Eighth Amendment. On January 29, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion for default against Defendant Quillen for failure to reply. Plaintiff contends that the Court, by order filed November 2, 2009, directed the United States Marshal to serve Defendant Quillen within ten days, and Defendant did not file a reply within twenty days afterwards. Plaintiff thus contends that judgment should be entered against Defendant. Plaintiff ignores several parts of the Court's November 2, 2009 order. Defendant has sixty days after being served with the summons and complaint to return a waiver of service. (Doc. 9, Order 1:26-2:8.) Even assuming the United States Marshal notified Defendant Quillen by November 12, 2009 of the commencement of this action, that would still give Defendant until 1 v. (Doc. 11) T. QUILLEN, Defendant. / LAMONT SHEPARD, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00809-DLB PC ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 March 5, 2010, to return a waiver of service. For entry of default to occur, a party must fail to plead or otherwise defend. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55. Before this can occur, a party must first make an appearance before this Court. Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for entry of default, filed January 29, 2010, is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 77e0d6 February 2, 2010 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?