Shepard v. Quillen

Filing 189

Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice; ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/29/17. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517 Attorney General of California JON S. ALLIN, State Bar No. 155069 Supervising Deputy Attorney General MATTHEW ROSS WILSON, State Bar No. 236309 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 322-6372 Fax: (916) 324-5205 E-mail: Matthew.Wilson@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendant Wise 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRESNO DIVISION 11 12 13 LAMONT SHEPARD, 14 15 v. 1:09-cv-00809 BAM Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)); ORDER 16 J. WISE, 17 Defendant. 18 19 Plaintiff Lamont Shepard and Defendant J. Wise have resolved this case in its entirety. 20 21 Therefore, the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice under Federal Rule of 22 Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 2 3 Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. There is no prevailing party in this action. It is so stipulated. 4 5 Dated: March 24, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 6 /s/ Lamont Shepard (Original Signature on File) 7 Lamont Shepard Plaintiff Pro Se 8 9 10 Dated: March 24, 2017 11 12 13 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California JON S. ALLIN Supervising Deputy Attorney General /s/ Matthew Ross Wilson MATTHEW ROSS WILSON Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendant Wise 14 15 16 17 SA2016302819 32807367.doc 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER Based on the parties’ stipulation, this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 29, 2017 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?