Shepard v. Quillen
Filing
189
Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice; ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/29/17. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517
Attorney General of California
JON S. ALLIN, State Bar No. 155069
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
MATTHEW ROSS WILSON, State Bar No. 236309
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: (916) 322-6372
Fax: (916) 324-5205
E-mail: Matthew.Wilson@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendant Wise
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
FRESNO DIVISION
11
12
13
LAMONT SHEPARD,
14
15
v.
1:09-cv-00809 BAM
Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
(Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)); ORDER
16
J. WISE,
17
Defendant.
18
19
Plaintiff Lamont Shepard and Defendant J. Wise have resolved this case in its entirety.
20
21
Therefore, the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice under Federal Rule of
22
Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
2
3
Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. There is no prevailing
party in this action.
It is so stipulated.
4
5
Dated: March 24, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
6
/s/ Lamont Shepard (Original Signature on File)
7
Lamont Shepard
Plaintiff Pro Se
8
9
10
Dated: March 24, 2017
11
12
13
XAVIER BECERRA
Attorney General of California
JON S. ALLIN
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
/s/ Matthew Ross Wilson
MATTHEW ROSS WILSON
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendant
Wise
14
15
16
17
SA2016302819
32807367.doc
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER
Based on the parties’ stipulation, this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the
Court is instructed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 29, 2017
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?