Hernandez v. Smith et al

Filing 36

ORDER Extending Discovery and Scheduling Order Deadlines Set Forth in Court's November 7, 2014 Order to Defendant R.D. Smith signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/15/2014. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RAUL HERNANDEZ,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
R.D. SMITH, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

[ECF Nos. 30, 34, 35]

This action is proceeding against Defendants R. D. Smith and L. Kirk for deliberate
indifference to Plaintiff’s dental needs.
On May 13, 2013, Defendant L. Kirk filed an answer to the third amended complaint. On

21
22

ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND
SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES SET FORTH
IN COURT’S NOVEMBER 7, 2014 ORDER TO
DEFENDANT R.D. SMITH

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19
20

Case No.: 1:09-cv-00828-AWI-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff Raul Hernandez is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

November 7, 2013, the Court issued a discovery and scheduling order. (ECF No. 30.)
On April 11, 2014, Defendant R.D. Smith filed an answer to the first amended complaint.

23
24

(ECF No. 35.)

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

In light of the fact that the discovery and scheduling order was issued prior to the filing of

2

Defendant Smith’s answer, Defendant R.D. Smith is advised that the discovery and scheduling order

3

issued November 7, 2013, is extended and made applicable to him as well as Defendant L. Kirk.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

April 15, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2