Hernandez v. Smith et al

Filing 50

ORDER DENYING 49 Motion signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/10/2014. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAUL HERNANDEZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 Case No. 1:09-cv-00828-AWI-SAB ORDER DENYING MOTION v. ECF NO. 49 R.D. SMITH, et al., Defendants. 15 16 17 Plaintiff Raul Hernandez is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On October 9, 2014, Plaintiff filed a “Notice of Motion to Revisit Proposal Conference 20 and Settlement.” (ECF No. 49.) Although unclear, Plaintiff appears to request a settlement 21 conference. Defendants have previously indicated that a settlement conference would not be 22 beneficial at this time in part because they intend to file a motion for summary judgment in the 23 near future. 24 Plaintiff is advised that the Court will not set a settlement conference in this action unless 25 all parties jointly request one. Irrespective of Plaintiff’s desire to settle, the Court has no power 26 to force Defendants to settle. Accordingly, the Court will not set a settlement conference unless 27 both parties file a joint request, signed by both Plaintiff and Defendants, requesting a settlement 28 conference. 1 Based upon the foregoing, Plaintiff’s October 9, 2014 motion is DENIED (ECF No. 49). 1 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: October 10, 2014 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?