Guron et al v. Aytes et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER re: Extension of Time to Respond to Amended Complaint. Defendants' answer is due on January 14, 2010. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/15/2009. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2729 Attorneys for Defendants IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SARABJIT GURON, Plaintiff, v. Michael Aytes, et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 09-cv-F-867 OWW DLB JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT This is an immigration case in which plaintiffs challenge the denial by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services' (CIS) of her visa petitions on her husband's behalf. On December 4, 2009, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, challenging a new denial following reopening by CIS. The government respectfully requests additional time to obtain a copy of the administrative record and prepare its answer to the amended complaint. Accordingly, the parties stipulate that the date for filing the government's answer be extended to January 14, 2010. Dated: December 10, 2009 BANJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney By: /s/Audrey Hemesath Audrey B. Hemesath Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for the Defendants -1- 1 2 3 4 5 By: /s/ Robert B. Jobe Robert B. Jobe Attorney for the Plaintiff ORDER 6 Pursuant to this Joint Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY 7 ORDERED that the defendants' Answer is due on January 14, 2010. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3b142a December 15, 2009 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?