Martinez v. Adams et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER to continue Scheduling Conference from 3/2/2010 to 4/22/2010 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (DLB) before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/11/2010. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 K e n I. Karan, Esq., California State Bar No. 204843 kka r a n . la w @ gm a il. c o m LA W OFFICE OF KEN I. KARAN 3 6 3 1 -D Village Circle C a rls b a d , CA 92008 (7 6 0 ) 420-5488 F a x (866) 841-5420 A tto rn e y for Plaintiff Steven C. Martinez U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) P la in tif f , ) ) vs . ) ) D e rra l G. ADAMS, Warden, Corcoran ) Sta te Prison, William J. MCGUINNESS, ) M .D ., Chief Medical Officer, Corcoran ) Sta te Prison, Frances GARZA, nurse, ) E m ily VARGAS, nurse, Catherine NACAR ) , nurse, Michael VAN NATTA, nurse, ) M a rk SMITH, nurse, Cornelio GARCIA, ) c o rre c tio n a l officer, Paul SENA, ) c o rre c tio n a l officer, and DOES 1 through ) 5 0 , inclusive, ) ) D e fe n d a n ts . ) ) ST E V E N C. MARTINEZ, C A SE NO.: 1:09!CV!00899!LJO!DLB STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO C O N T IN U E MANDATORY SCHEDULING C O N FEREN C E Hearing Date: T im e : Location: J u d ge : M a rc h 2, 2010 9 :0 0 a.m. D e p a rtm e n t 9 H o n . Dennis L. Beck P la in tiff, by and through counsel, Ken I. Karan, and Defendants, by and through counsel 21 D a vid A. Carrasco, stipulate as follows: 22 1. 23 2. 24 3. 25 4. 26 o u tc o m e of the motion. 27 5. 28 1 STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE D e fe n d a n ts have filed a motion to dismiss the above captioned case. T h e hearing on the motion is set for March 11, 2010. T h e Court has set the Mandatory Scheduling Conference for March 2, 2010. T h e parties' input to the Joint Scheduling Conference Report will be affected by the In order to make the best use of the Court's time, the parties agree to continue the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 M a n d a to ry Scheduling Conference to a date 30 days after the March 2 hearing, or to a date the C o u rt finds appropriate given the need to meet and confer and draft the Joint Scheduling C o n fe re n c e Report. So stipulated, D a te d : February 10, 2010 Signed: /s/ Ken I. Karan, Esq. A tto rn e y for Plaintiff D a te d : February 10, 2010 10 11 12 13 Signed: /s/ David A. Carrasco, Esq. Su p e rvis in g Deputy Attorney General A tto rn e y s for Defendants H a vin g reviewed the stipulation to modify the Court's order, and having found good 14 c a u s e therefore, the stipulation is the order of the court. The Mandatory Scheduling Conference 15 is continued to April 22, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 Dated: 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE February 11, 2010 3b142a /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?