Kingsburg Apple Packers, et al, vs. Ballantine Produce Co., Inc. et al,

Filing 324

ORDER VACATING hearing date of January 14, 2013, and taking matter under submission, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/11/2013. (Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 KINGSBURG APPLE PACKERS, INC, dba KINGSBURG ORCHARDS, et al., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) BALLANTINE PRODUCE INC. et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) DIDUDUO LAND MANAGEMENT, a ) California Corporation, et al., ) ) Intervenors, ) ) v. ) ) BALLANTINE PRODUCE CO. INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) 1:09-cv-0901 AWI JLT ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE OF JANUARY 14, 2013, AND TAKING MATTER UNDER SUBMISSION 21 22 In this action for damages, defendant Ballantine Produce, Inc., et al. (“Defendants”) 23 has moved for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 24 Procedure as to the order issued by the court on August 10, 2012, giving effect to the notice 25 of voluntary dismissal of the action in intervention by Diduduo Land Management 26 (“Intervenor”) and the consequent dismissal of third party claims by Defendants against 27 Intervenor for equitable indemnity, contribution and other claims. The matter was set for oral 28 argument to be held on January 14, 2013. The court has reviewed Defendants’ motion, 1 Intervenor’s opposition and related documents and finds that the matter is suitable for 2 decision without oral argument. Local Rule 78-230(h). 3 4 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of January 5 14, 2013, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of January 14, 2013, the 6 Court will take the matter under submission, and will thereafter issue its decision. 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 January 11, 2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?